The deposit slip that was never stamped by the bank

[Scott Kaiser]

With all due respect, Jim, the more time and effort I put into doing my own research in reaction to your numerous presentations, the more I understand what you do not know.

^This is about the only statement I can agree with you on!

Scott, if you had actually read and understood the research details I shared with you, you could have been knowledgeable enough to point out to the San Antonio source you contacted and presented quotes from, to point out the details I am AGAIN sharing with you here; you could have informed
your source that he was describing an obsolete and thus irrelevant FRB postal money order processing sequence because the money order you think
you are researching was issued from a then new, point of sale, print punch, Friden postal money order machine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tom, what I think you don't understand is the [procedure] and [polices] is what I'm trying very hard to point out here, in other words, the handling of the PMO's, endorsements and returns, not sequence, point of sales, print, punch or machined. That is all obsolete/irrelevant, the relevant point is... Is the Federal Reserve Bank responsible for endorsing PMO's prior to returning the PMO's to USPS? I have proven, without theory, without a second guess, without doubt, and without question, they do, get it? Got it? Good!!!!!!