05-01-2017, 08:27 PM
"If Oswald were in the lunchroom then that would explain Adams not seeing him."
Which lunchroom? Are you speaking of the location of the second floor vending machines?
"This is too loose to have any meaning." (Note the irony.)
Only if you have not read the very long thread over at EF. There are many people there who have been convinced by some very interesting film and gif work that Baker did not head directly for the entrance to the TSBD once he jumped off his motorcycle. This would delay his entry inside even more. Which would explain Posner's question about why Sandy and Victoria did not see him. But the supervisor did. (You ignore that and say, well heck, why didn't anyone say anything about it. Was the film faked?) If you are not aware of all the questions concerning the validity of the WC reconstructions of Baker entering the building and going up the stairs, and the alleged assassin hiding the rifle and coming own the stairs, then I refer you to, among other examples, Harold Weisberg's Whitewash. (pgs. 85-89)
If you want to ignore Baker's first day affidavit and make up silly excuses why it is so opposed to what he said later, then that is fine. For you. And if you want to say, as a blanket statement, Bart is not credible--and leave out the many pages of evidence he supplies that goes to the heart of the matter, much of it never being in the adduced record, that is fine also. For you. Just remember two things though: 1.) It was Hancock, Conway and Wexler who gave him that award. Not any of those people you have a blood feud with, like Stan Dane; and 2.) The validity of the Second Floor encounter is not reliant on Prayer Man being Oswald. I brought up the former in Reclaiming Parkland, not the latter.
For you to smear Bart with PM over the second floor encounter is one more indication of your ongoing Blood Feud with ROKC, which you seem intent on infesting this forum with.
Which lunchroom? Are you speaking of the location of the second floor vending machines?
"This is too loose to have any meaning." (Note the irony.)
Only if you have not read the very long thread over at EF. There are many people there who have been convinced by some very interesting film and gif work that Baker did not head directly for the entrance to the TSBD once he jumped off his motorcycle. This would delay his entry inside even more. Which would explain Posner's question about why Sandy and Victoria did not see him. But the supervisor did. (You ignore that and say, well heck, why didn't anyone say anything about it. Was the film faked?) If you are not aware of all the questions concerning the validity of the WC reconstructions of Baker entering the building and going up the stairs, and the alleged assassin hiding the rifle and coming own the stairs, then I refer you to, among other examples, Harold Weisberg's Whitewash. (pgs. 85-89)
If you want to ignore Baker's first day affidavit and make up silly excuses why it is so opposed to what he said later, then that is fine. For you. And if you want to say, as a blanket statement, Bart is not credible--and leave out the many pages of evidence he supplies that goes to the heart of the matter, much of it never being in the adduced record, that is fine also. For you. Just remember two things though: 1.) It was Hancock, Conway and Wexler who gave him that award. Not any of those people you have a blood feud with, like Stan Dane; and 2.) The validity of the Second Floor encounter is not reliant on Prayer Man being Oswald. I brought up the former in Reclaiming Parkland, not the latter.
For you to smear Bart with PM over the second floor encounter is one more indication of your ongoing Blood Feud with ROKC, which you seem intent on infesting this forum with.