07-01-2017, 07:30 PM
That situation only exists because of a moderator who openly censors people who offer the better information. What is preferred on the Education Forum is endless chasing of windmills in the direction of Murphy and ROKC. People who offer firm proof are vilified and subjected to dirty tricks. When you challenge that corruption you are accused of not being respectful. That alleged lack of respect is then used as an excuse to put you on moderation, even though your internet-leading evidence has gone unanswered by the opposition. That's intellectually dishonest and the people who then don't have to answer for their failings are not going to protest it.