14-01-2017, 07:09 AM
Douglass seems to be saying that FBI invented the alleged sighting of Oswald by Carolyn Arnold in the foyer in order to avoid the lunchroom encounter.
The context Douglass implies is that Carolyn Arnold complained to Golz that FBI had switched her statement that she had seen Oswald in the lunchroom to seeing him in the foyer. So in other words the Murphy advocates are honoring what was clearly a lie and not seeing what it was designed to get around. The only conclusion is FBI knew Oswald being seen by Arnold in the lunchroom was dangerous to their official version so they changed it to the foyer. A clear sign of guilt and also clear sign that Oswald was in the lunchroom.
The context Douglass implies is that Carolyn Arnold complained to Golz that FBI had switched her statement that she had seen Oswald in the lunchroom to seeing him in the foyer. So in other words the Murphy advocates are honoring what was clearly a lie and not seeing what it was designed to get around. The only conclusion is FBI knew Oswald being seen by Arnold in the lunchroom was dangerous to their official version so they changed it to the foyer. A clear sign of guilt and also clear sign that Oswald was in the lunchroom.