19-01-2017, 04:37 AM
No it isn't. It clearly shows a woman's face that Davidson's metadata proves was part of the original Wiegman image. That's why the challengers could not show anything wrong with it because it proved that all Davidson did was place the Wiegman Film into photoshop with some contrast and brightness adjustments that brought the face into visibility. As his metadata proved all it did was bring out an image that was already there. This is the science and the challengers haven't answered it.
Gordon put me on moderation shortly after I out-argued Stancak and he couldn't respond to my last post to him. That post is still on the board and Stancak hasn't managed an answer to it for over a month now. I have further photo evidence that reinforces my other evidence but Gordon won't let me post it even though he said he was moderating for "educational content". He's obviously moderating for the Murphy-ites in order to protect a false sense of legitimacy for the theory and protect them from someone Gordon is aware can end the issue. It's quite dishonest.
Gordon put me on moderation shortly after I out-argued Stancak and he couldn't respond to my last post to him. That post is still on the board and Stancak hasn't managed an answer to it for over a month now. I have further photo evidence that reinforces my other evidence but Gordon won't let me post it even though he said he was moderating for "educational content". He's obviously moderating for the Murphy-ites in order to protect a false sense of legitimacy for the theory and protect them from someone Gordon is aware can end the issue. It's quite dishonest.