Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!!
#1
OK, sports fans, I have a new diagram "Location in Weigman" posted in the PHOTOS section of my website at https://www.jfkinsidejob.com/pm which proves that PrayerMan was at the front of the TSBD landing.

And I have sent a synopsis of the height argument, with the relevant photos & diagrams, to Megan Bryant, the Director of Collections at the Sixth Floor Museum. Along with a strong recommendation that a digital scan of the Darnell film not be made- not without first presenting a substantive argument that overcomes the Doyle height argument.

When Sean Murphy formulated his hypothesis that PrayerMan was Oswald, he neglected to make a height analysis. And when eliminating other building employees and strangers as possible candidates, he failed to consider that the witnesses could have been mistaken, or forgotten- about where they stood, about whether any strangers were there, about whether any workers from neighboring buildings may have been on the TSBD landing.

And there are two incontrovertible facts in Weigman's film which completely devastate Murphy's hypothesis.

1) The film shows an apparent drinking motion, from a coffee or a Coke. This motion requires about a foot and a half of clearance from the alcove's west wall.

2) The vertical border-strip of the entranceway's glass partition is seen just behind PrayerMan's east shoulder (the viewer's right). Anyone's shoulders are about one foot in width. Weigman filmed at approximately 30 degrees to the TSBD landing (Darnell filmed at almost exactly 20 degrees). And so the natural body proportion sets a constraint as to where PrayerMan can possibly be standing- he absolutely has to be within the shaded area on the Location in Weigman diagram. Even with a much broader angle estimated for Weigman, PrayerMan still has to be situated well forward on the landing.

Situated at the front- and not in the corner- means we get a near one-to-one correspondence between the heights of PrayerMan and Wesley Frazier in the Darnell film. They are nearly equidistant from the camera, and only a 1% or so correction needs to be made for perspective.

Darnell's Camera Car 3 was about "70 feet from the closest point of the building" (Pictures of the Pain, p. 424) and so about 75 feet from Frazier, and 76.5 feet from PrayerMan. I measure their respective heights on my Darnell blowup as 5.2 and 4.4 cm. Since Frazier was 72.25 inches tall, PrayerMan calculates to (72.25)(76.5/75)(4.4/5.2) = 5' 2 1/2", to a reasonable approximation. Nowhere near the height of Oswald, and typical of the height of a woman

There is zero chance that PrayerMan is Oswald. Don't you think Sean Murphy realizes this?

Don't you understand, that if he truly believed he was correct about PrayerMan, Sean would be passionately involved in the effort at getting a Darnell film-scan achieved?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cznNVndXqmk

My next 2 posts, immediately following, are scathing critiques of this fantasist, which are long overdue. With the PrayerMan boondoggle he pulls off a trifecta of self-will run riot.

Please allow me to post them and finish introducing this topic, before responding.


Messages In This Thread
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Richard Gilbride - 31-01-2017, 08:20 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Richard Gilbride - 31-01-2017, 08:58 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 31-01-2017, 09:03 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Richard Gilbride - 31-01-2017, 09:41 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by LR Trotter - 31-01-2017, 10:10 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 31-01-2017, 10:25 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 31-01-2017, 10:52 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Albert Doyle - 31-01-2017, 10:57 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by LR Trotter - 31-01-2017, 11:11 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 31-01-2017, 11:16 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Albert Doyle - 31-01-2017, 11:24 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 31-01-2017, 11:31 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 31-01-2017, 11:54 PM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Tom Scully - 01-02-2017, 12:05 AM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 01-02-2017, 12:13 AM
Sean Murphy- wrong again!!! - by Scott Kaiser - 01-02-2017, 12:18 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Sniper's Nest Corner boxes in the 6th floor Museum are wrong David Josephs 28 16,931 15-03-2016, 08:47 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  "People just don't Care About the JFK Assassination" WRONG. Nathaniel Heidenheimer 4 4,933 23-11-2015, 07:31 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  Sean Murphy's research deserves more Ivan De Mey 509 128,093 04-11-2015, 09:22 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  Is there something wrong with the MFF site? David Josephs 6 5,020 30-10-2015, 06:52 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  What's wrong with this picture? Drew Phipps 5 4,322 05-03-2015, 11:50 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Why Palmer McBride was Wrong Greg R Parker 0 2,529 10-04-2014, 12:34 AM
Last Post: Greg R Parker
  TSBD Rifle Wrong Length, Alleged Shipment Unverified Nick Rose 16 8,936 18-01-2014, 07:53 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  See anything wrong with this picture? Greg Burnham 5 4,053 24-08-2012, 05:33 PM
Last Post: Keith Millea
  Kennedy, Reagan, Loved for All the Wrong Reasons: Robert Dallek - Businessweek Bernice Moore 1 2,555 30-11-2011, 04:52 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)