Sean Murphy- wrong again!!!

[Albert Doyle]

Thanks Richard. It is nice to see well-directed eloquence and refreshingly objective intelligence finally confront this ridiculous situation.

And I have sent a synopsis of the height argument, with the relevant photos & diagrams, to Megan Bryant, the Director of Collections at the Sixth Floor Museum. Along with a strong recommendation that a digital scan of the Darnell film not be made- not without first presenting a substantive argument that overcomes the Doyle height argument.

The evidence against Prayer Man is so strong that release of the original filmstock should be encouraged under any circumstances since the first photo analysis expert to get hold of it will confirm everything we've been saying. But, yes, guidance of that expert to the evidence we have found should help resolve the issue once and for all.

When Sean Murphy formulated his hypothesis that PrayerMan was Oswald, he neglected to make a height analysis. And when eliminating other building employees and strangers as possible candidates, he failed to consider that the witnesses could have been mistaken, or forgotten- about where they stood, about whether any strangers were there, about whether any workers from neighboring buildings may have been on the TSBD landing.

I'm of the mind that Prayer Man is simply a TSBD employee that moved around. ROKC and Murphy have brainwashed people into thinking their positions are permanent and unchanging. This is achieved by carefully arguing all information under the assumption Prayer Man is Oswald and omitting all that counters it. And, as it now appears, all those who counter it.

And there are two incontrovertible facts in Weigman's film which completely devastate Murphy's hypothesis.

1) The film shows an apparent drinking motion, from a coffee or a Coke. This motion requires about a foot and a half of clearance from the alcove's west wall.

Have to disagree. Duncan MacRae's enlargement of Davidson's enhancement clearly shows a sun-lit hand to be the glowing object in question. It is important to get that right because it is an important landmark for the positioning geometry.

2) The vertical border-strip of the entranceway's glass partition is seen just behind PrayerMan's east shoulder (the viewer's right). Anyone's shoulders are about one foot in width. Weigman filmed at approximately 30 degrees to the TSBD landing (Darnell filmed at almost exactly 20 degrees). And so the natural body proportion sets a constraint as to where PrayerMan can possibly be standing- he absolutely has to be within the shaded area on the Location in Weigman diagram. Even with a much broader angle estimated for Weigman, PrayerMan still has to be situated well forward on the landing.

I'd say a foot and a half for the average shoulder width.


If you go to the Bear Pit thread you'll see I caught Stancak deliberately avoiding applying his Prayer Man graphic cartoon image to his overlay image of the portal exactly because he knew it showed exactly what you say here.

Since Frazier was 72.25 inches tall, PrayerMan calculates to (72.25)(76.5/75)(4.4/5.2) = 5' 2 1/2", to a reasonable approximation. Nowhere near the height of Oswald, and typical of the height of a woman

This is the basic argument that even Stancak admitted before he quit. The rest now pretend that didn't happen or that it doesn't finally disprove the Prayer Man issue. (I would say more like 5 foot 5 or 6)

There is zero chance that PrayerMan is Oswald. Don't you think Sean Murphy realizes this?

Don't you understand, that if he truly believed he was correct about PrayerMan, Sean would be passionately involved in the effort at getting a Darnell film-scan achieved?

It is common sense that no man with such case-cracking evidence would just abandon it if it were real.




Since your earlier Education Forum posts Chris Davidson enhanced a steady frame from Wiegman and produced the clear face of a woman on Prayer Man. ROKC knew they were sunk by this so they lied and said it was an illusion. Davidson is sort of a wimp and prone to mob intimidation, so he posted his metadata, that the Murphy gang didn't think he could produce, and backed-off. That metadata proved that the woman's face seen in Wiegman was a real and existing part of the Wiegman frame from which it originated. The Murphy-ites have been trying to forget that ever since with the help of some very shitty and anti-intellectual censoring.