Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened

[LR Trotter]

Hopefully, if and/or when I disagree with a statement, I indicate that the statement is incorrect due to an incorrect and/or misreading of certain evidence, but without saying someone is lying. As well, it is my hope that if and/or when I wish to indicate someone's story is a lie, I do so to their face, or at least in a manner for said person to respond directly, or possibly indirectly from a reliable source. To imply that "lunchroom encounter" participants and/or eyewitnesses regarding a 53+ year old event are lying, is an implication without merit, regardless of whomever that was not there, that makes such implication.