18-02-2017, 05:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 18-02-2017, 07:39 PM by Albert Doyle.)
The point was a serious one and deserves more respect on a board that pretends a serious academic standard. I don't know why O'Blazney would violate board decorum over the perfectly reasonable subject of Sarah Stanton.
For those who have the intellectual self-control to honor on-topic, Larry wanted to know the identity of Scarf Lady. It is possible Scarf Lady is the person in question. Right now, I think Scarf Lady has a different face than Davidson's face of a woman and is not the person in question. That's why all efforts should be made to find out more information on Stanton. O'Blazney represents the anti-intellectual mob that is preventing good research. They are directly responsible for this not being done because of mob-like bullying.
Mark, get back to us when you can respectfully answer Davidson's metadata...Frazier said he was talking to Sarah Stanton at the time of Darnell...It deserves serious follow-through...
.
For those who have the intellectual self-control to honor on-topic, Larry wanted to know the identity of Scarf Lady. It is possible Scarf Lady is the person in question. Right now, I think Scarf Lady has a different face than Davidson's face of a woman and is not the person in question. That's why all efforts should be made to find out more information on Stanton. O'Blazney represents the anti-intellectual mob that is preventing good research. They are directly responsible for this not being done because of mob-like bullying.
Mark, get back to us when you can respectfully answer Davidson's metadata...Frazier said he was talking to Sarah Stanton at the time of Darnell...It deserves serious follow-through...
.