19-02-2017, 07:13 PM
Scott, the Mexico trip account Oswald allegedly told JVB is obviously a fake claim because we now know Oswald never went to the Cuban Consulate in Mexico. Duran was tortured by our Nazi CIA using the Mexico Police as proxies. They tortured her in order to make her go along with the phony setting-up of Oswald in Mexico. Being caught in a lie JVB doubled-down and made up one of her classic schoolgirl excuses that Duran lied about an impostor in the Consulate because she was married and wanted to cover-up her affair with Oswald. The problem with that is the affair itself was probably yet another fake account invented by CIA to make it look like Oswald was literally in bed with the commies. So JVB is probably shopping more Oswald legend fables in order make up for her being busted telling a false story about Oswald describing his Cuban Consulate visit to her upon his return to Dallas.
Her sychophants have to be reading this. Does it ever dawn on you why they totally ignore it just like their cult leader JVB and what that tells you? The bottom line is JVB tried to get out of this by saying Duran lied in order to cover up an alleged affair, however she ignores the fact that Duran was tortured in order to make her change her story. JVB also ignores the fact that Jim D impressively showed that ALL the Consulate employee witnesses said the man wasn't Oswald. So the affair excuse doesn't work and JVB has avoided accounting for this ever since Jim D pointed it out over a year ago.
What say yee JVB sychophants? Or do you just blindly follow any lies JVB feeds you? A smart linguistic forensic expert will see a meandering pattern of thinking up a long thought out excuse in JVB's explanation of her claim. The form of her long rambling answers shows that she is once again going out to the same book-sourced evidence she got the original claim from and contriving an excuse - only Jim D busted her once again in her attempt and she wasn't able to answer. The Duran affair excuse doesn't work and JVB wasn't able to account for every other Consulate employee also corroborating that the man wasn't Oswald. And if it wasn't Oswald then Lee could not have come home to JVB in Dallas and described his visit to the Consulate. JVB has been caught spinning Oswald tales out of books...
Her sychophants have to be reading this. Does it ever dawn on you why they totally ignore it just like their cult leader JVB and what that tells you? The bottom line is JVB tried to get out of this by saying Duran lied in order to cover up an alleged affair, however she ignores the fact that Duran was tortured in order to make her change her story. JVB also ignores the fact that Jim D impressively showed that ALL the Consulate employee witnesses said the man wasn't Oswald. So the affair excuse doesn't work and JVB has avoided accounting for this ever since Jim D pointed it out over a year ago.
What say yee JVB sychophants? Or do you just blindly follow any lies JVB feeds you? A smart linguistic forensic expert will see a meandering pattern of thinking up a long thought out excuse in JVB's explanation of her claim. The form of her long rambling answers shows that she is once again going out to the same book-sourced evidence she got the original claim from and contriving an excuse - only Jim D busted her once again in her attempt and she wasn't able to answer. The Duran affair excuse doesn't work and JVB wasn't able to account for every other Consulate employee also corroborating that the man wasn't Oswald. And if it wasn't Oswald then Lee could not have come home to JVB in Dallas and described his visit to the Consulate. JVB has been caught spinning Oswald tales out of books...