14-03-2017, 06:55 PM
Quote:I apologise to everyone for dragging the discussion to curtain rod story but the question asked repeatedly and understandably by fellow researchers is why would Mr. Frazier not say whether Prayer Man was or was not Lee Oswald, and the answer would be that he may not volunteer any information about who stood next to him (if it were Oswald) since he was compromised from the very beginning.
This is why Jim DiEugenio and the Education Forum are not credible. Whether Frazier was intimidated into not talking or not he still directly commented that he was standing next to "Sarah" when Clavery ran up shouting the president had been shot.
Stancak ignores that his statement here would also cover why Frazier may not have mentioned anything about Baker going in. In fact this would be more likely since the cops are the ones who intimidated Frazier and would therefore be the first people Frazier would not mention. Totally ignoring this, ROKC and Stancak still stand by their point that Frazier failed to see Baker and it was firm evidence that Baker didn't go in right away. One rule for the BS Prayer Man theory and another for that which disproves it.
This is a perfect example of the credulousness of Stancak's input. Jim is a very sharp man who specializes in cutting through this kind of faulty research but for some reason instead of applying his usual wit he ignores its obvious failings and gives praise to it and Stancak.
Stancak is a risible hack and incompetent. He uses that English as a second language apologetic Euro researcher approach to sucker people in to those phony appeals. As shown by this example, this offering is dishonestly designed to avoid responding to Frazier's statement that he was standing next to "Sarah" when Calvery ran up. It's all right there in the Dunkel Film. As evidenced by its conspicuous omission, it is also designed to avoid dealing with how this intimidation also accounted for his not mentioning Baker. If Frazier was forced to lie about the curtain rods then he almost certainly omitted seeing Baker for the same reason. He just wasn't doing anything to get himself in trouble with the cops.
Don't let Stancak divert you to the curtain rods. His protector moderator Gordon is deliberately keeping me from making these points on the Education Forum where they belong because he is aware of their devastating value. Make Stancak and DiEugenio answer for Frazier's comment about speaking to "Sarah" when Calvery ran up vis a vis the Dunkel Film. And make him answer how Frazier's muzzling also accounts for his not mentioning Baker.
Of all the flagrant dishonesty...
By the way, I think Stancak got that Frazier compromise argument from me. Stancak is stealing my material and using it against my conclusions.
.