01-10-2009, 07:27 PM
Wow, David Guyatt, those two articles you linked in by you and McMurtry are stunning ... chilling.
I take note of footnote #153 in McMurtry referencing Brzezinski Z.[/FONT] Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era Viking Press, New York, p 57 & 252, 1970 and the text [/FONT] “The logic in the prediction by [/FONT]Brzezinski[/FONT][i] of the appearance of [/FONT]a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior without hindrance by liberal democratic values[/FONT] is compelling.153 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victim's perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: domestic adversaries;[170] security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; persons witnessing serious improprieties; and those prone to committing advantageous felonies. [/FONT]Legality is readily circumvented by executive orders, (particularly declaration of a crisis or emergency situation), which can be sealed[/FONT], and this prerogative is only accountable to co-equal branches of government as is now the case with terrorism suspects...."
The red emphasis is mine and suggests that these articles also ought to be linked into threads having to do with martial law and the G-20 protests.
And it leads me to ask you (and others) if indeed there is any evidence that this technology is already in the hands of domestic US law enforcement and National Guard, or if it is already embedded into the LRAD technology?
[/FONT]
I take note of footnote #153 in McMurtry referencing Brzezinski Z.[/FONT] Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era Viking Press, New York, p 57 & 252, 1970 and the text [/FONT] “The logic in the prediction by [/FONT]Brzezinski[/FONT][i] of the appearance of [/FONT]a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior without hindrance by liberal democratic values[/FONT] is compelling.153 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victim's perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: domestic adversaries;[170] security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; persons witnessing serious improprieties; and those prone to committing advantageous felonies. [/FONT]Legality is readily circumvented by executive orders, (particularly declaration of a crisis or emergency situation), which can be sealed[/FONT], and this prerogative is only accountable to co-equal branches of government as is now the case with terrorism suspects...."
The red emphasis is mine and suggests that these articles also ought to be linked into threads having to do with martial law and the G-20 protests.
And it leads me to ask you (and others) if indeed there is any evidence that this technology is already in the hands of domestic US law enforcement and National Guard, or if it is already embedded into the LRAD technology?
[/FONT]
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"