14-03-2017, 05:42 PM
Mark Russo Wrote:In an apparent attempt at retaliation for Mr Doyle's comments here about ROKC, this week's Rob Clark podcast was guest hosted by Bart and Mr LeDoux, and they made a disparaging comment about Mr Doyle in the 106th minute.
I'm not the issue. The evidence is. If you look at Ed LeDoux's offerings he is basically like an internet comments section dummy and doesn't have any analytical research analysis skill. Out on the serious academic world researchers who favored Murphy are ignoring our credible evidence and giving favor to those two and their garbage research. Jim DiEugenio is the biggest violator and he doesn't answer for it.
We know those two idiots are goons. What is inexcusable is we have offered good evidence that the rest of the community stays quiet about while those two attack us at a moronic level without ever intelligently addressing our evidence. The community is so set on Murphy that it has allowed credulous researchers to destroy its integrity all for the pathetic purpose of hanging on to Murphy despite the facts.
Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton. They know this is true. Even Stancak gives hints like his recent comment on the Education Forum saying "Prayer Man may not be Oswald". The pro-Murphy people are not honest because they know what made Stancak say that (despite hypocritical censorship of the better evidence). I could quickly finish off ROKC and Kamp on a level playing field but they have influenced UK moderator Gordon in their favor. He plays dirty and I am unable to answer those idiots.