Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened

[Albert Doyle]

Here is the dishonest evidence DiEugenio now supports from ROKC as spoken by Andrej Stancak:

I have commented on reasons for which those seeing Oswald in the doorway in a number of my previous posts. For instance, I pointed to the treatment which witnesses opposing the official line received (e.g., Serrano's interview in the RFK case, The Thin Blue Line which actually relates to Dallas) unless they agreed to keep silence. Only the people on the top landing were in position to see Prayer Man. Other people, such as Carl Jones standing at the lower west corner of the doorway, would not know who stood behind him. Oswald stood in the doorway for a short period of time, maybe 120 seconds, and it was the time of pandemonium; Prayer Man would not be a conspicuous person to remember even if someone would glance on the doorway. He would only be seen from certain view angles, excluding a large number of potential random observers. The lack of information about Oswald's whereabouts, especially at the time of shooting and shortly later as he was leaving the Depository, equals the lack of information related to his possible short stay in the doorway. He allegedly left three minutes after the shooting, and there were already people around on his way out in the doorway and the vestibule. No one from the employees remembered seeing him leaving? How comes?
The reason for covering up Lee's whereabouts after 12.00noon was the necessity to place him to the sixth floor. Any testimony about Lee's whereabouts would lead to further questions and to a likely dismantling of the cover-up.
I will come to Mr. Frazier's credibility in one of my next posts. I am on travel at the moment and have no access to my notes and to original sources.

Jim D is over on the Education Forum supporting Stancak because Jim is a Murphy die-hard who show-cased Murphy on his CTKA site and is not going to back off it no matter what counter evidence he sees. CTKA does not admit it is wrong. What these pro-Murphy mainstream researchers are doing is the equivalent of Fetzer and Cinque winning with their Doorway Man theory and taking over the assassination internet with it, pushing everyone else out of the way - including banning.


What ROKC and Stancak are presently doing is retreating in to the safe haze of the Frazier intimidation one-size-fits-all excuse for Frazier not seeing Oswald standing right next to him. It's not that Frazier wasn't intimidated. I think he definitely was. In fact, that police intimidation at Frazier's father's hospital room probably accounts for why Frazier said nothing about Baker. The Murphy theory supporters are hypocrites because they are quick to use that intimidation to explain why Frazier allegedly didn't mention Oswald but then ignore how it would equally apply to Frazier's not mentioning Baker.


It's pathetic seeing DiEugenio shilling for this obvious hack Stancak who is only getting away with this level of disingenuous garbage analysis because he knows he has some giant egos and assassination research dominators going along with him who won't call him on it. What Jim is helping Stancak ignore is that we have proven on many levels that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton. For some reason Bill Miller is blind to our best technical evidence that proves Prayer Man is too short to be Oswald and also has a clear woman's face as seen in the Davidson enhancement. Gordon is forcing Miller to be the only spokesperson for our side exactly because his inability helps artificially preserve the Prayer Man theory by omission.


The JFK research community is supposed to be an ego-less, objective academic group that honors good science and evidence. Thanks to these dominators it has now lapsed in to the ultimate hypocrisy where it practices the same dirty political tricks of those it has spent decades criticizing. DiEugenio is now openly assisting ROKC avoid the fact Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton. And he's doing it with the censorship assistance of James Gordon that this site was formed in opposition to. What Stancak is doing here is trying to conflate Frazier being intimidated by the DPD into it equaling evidence of Prayer Man being Oswald. This has gone too far and anyone who practices a sound level of Deep Political analysis will see Stancak achieves that by ignoring the evidence that disproves it - as does Jim. Jim is violating the ROKC proxy edict Dawn imposed on this board. It doesn't matter who you are. If you're ignoring good evidence you are violation the Deep Politics Forum rules.



.