Max Holland and Donald Carpenter vs Jim Garrison and the ARRB

[Scott Kaiser]

Those three scenes you refer to are not from "everything under the sun".

They are all a part of Garrison's experience in investigating the JFK case.

One can argue about the use of dramatic license. But they all happened.

And the film does show a motive for the crime. One which Garrison believed in. Namely, the expansion and the eventual monumental escalation of the Vietnam War.

The triumph of the film, and of Prouty's and John Newman's work, is that this idea finally made it out into the MSM, the public and, most incredible of all, even the world of academia. And it caused the release of about seven books on the subject. I have read most of them. The totality proves that Stone was correct on this, as was Prouty. LBJ did break with what Kennedy's policy was. This is a fact which Johnson deliberately tried to disguise by saying he was continuing JFK's policy. Which is a Texas sized lie.

But further, today, with all we have, it is now possible to actually trace the line of this withdrawal plan as it progressed.

Well, I could mention more, I thought three were enough, you say they all happened? How would you know?