11-04-2017, 08:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-04-2017, 04:44 AM by Jim DiEugenio.)
That thread has been closed since, as I noted months ago, the arguments have become too polarizing. I am surprised Gordon let it run as long as he did.
Miller was not arguing height at the end, he was arguing the width of the figure. That issue has been around since the start.
Miller buys the second floor lunch encounter en toto, and he does not think there is any problem with Baker's first day affidavit. Which is a bit shocking.
One good thing about the last few pages is that some people are finally beginning to see that there is problem with Wesley Frazier's credibility.
Miller was not arguing height at the end, he was arguing the width of the figure. That issue has been around since the start.
Miller buys the second floor lunch encounter en toto, and he does not think there is any problem with Baker's first day affidavit. Which is a bit shocking.
One good thing about the last few pages is that some people are finally beginning to see that there is problem with Wesley Frazier's credibility.