Why the second floor lunch room encounter could not have happened

[Albert Doyle]

Ray never considers the obvious that Baker had been coerced into hiding the fact Oswald may have been sitting comfortably at the lunchroom table eating just as Carolyn Arnold had seen him 6 1/2 minutes earlier. Even though this is the best evidence the pro-Murphy propagandists always try to ignore it and its significance towards the testimony.


Jim D says how could Baker not recognize the man sitting across from him in the police station? A smarter detective would realize it was exactly because Baker saw the suspect there that he fudged the lunchroom encounter because he knew it vindicated Oswald.


I think the walking away story is the accurate version because Harvey may have been looking out the lunchroom vestibule window because he heard a commotion or Truly calling for the elevator.. Being a CIA double Harvey flinched away from the door window after seeing a cop and Baker, being a cop trained in observing guilt, picked up on this right away. Harvey may have been doing both and even though Baker saw him in the vestibule when they confronted him in the lunchroom they saw his lunch spread out on the table where he had been sitting. The same place Carolyn Arnold saw him 6 minutes earlier.



You guys need to learn how to decipher evidence and do good detective work...Ray ignores me because he knows he's not going to do well if forced to answer my arguments...