14-04-2017, 06:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 14-04-2017, 07:13 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Doyle: Jim D says how could Baker not recognize the man sitting across from him in the police station? A smarter detective would realize it was exactly because Baker saw the suspect there that he fudged the lunchroom encounter because he knew it vindicated Oswald.
The above has to rank with some of the unintentional humor of Tracy Parnell over at EF.
That's ridicule Jim, that's obviously being used to flagrantly dodge lengthy posts that I've made here and their content. You're just proving my point. You're calling to the mob.
Jim, your regular research shows you are much smarter than this. I take what you are doing here to be deliberate playing dumb in order to avoid answering things you know might refute you.
Are you saying Baker was perfectly clean and was not corrupted by the ongoing conspiracy that was documented as going on the whole time during his encounter with Oswald and during his police station activities?
Sorry, Jim but my post deserves a better more respectful answer. Your position is clearly disingenuous and if you were more honest you would attempt to answer the credible points I've made...I'm still waiting for someone to honestly answer the significance of Truly telling his wife about the lunchroom encounter on Friday night...
.