14-04-2017, 07:37 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:And BTW, to show how simple minded and formulaic--almost robotic-- Doyle is on this issue.
There is corroboration for what Holmes says about the first floor.
Secondly, its an admission against interest. In other words, he is not supporting the official story, he is undermining it.
It doesn't work that way Jim. Your sychophants might let you get away with that because they are really running a friends club while citing strict site rules in order to escape admitting they were wrong, however we already pointed-out to you why Holmes can't be used as a witness in this issue. This is what you do Jim. You ignore the counter-argument, impugn its offerers in favor of ROKC, and then refer to it again even though you never answered why Harry Holmes should ever be referred to as a witness, or why he should be referred to when he was 1000 feet away at the time? You're avoiding answering why Holmes should be corroborated by anything or anybody if his testimony was never acceptable in the first place? Your argument style would never be allowed in here on any other issue. In fact you yourself would be the first person to shoot it down if someone else tried it.
I'm failing to see why we are talking about Holmes' testimony at all when we have established it was ridiculously inadmissible for the two main reasons that he was a government infiltrator and perjurer (proven by yourself), and the fact he was 1000 feet away and on the other side of the Plaza at the time???