15-04-2017, 10:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-04-2017, 10:46 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Quote:Smart people will suss Jim's disingenuousness in his saying "1st floor" instead of the "front steps" he is really saying without saying it directly.
Albert, you mean to tell me that you're presenting an argument of which you believe is the definition to Jim's statement which Jim says Oswald is on the "first floor," according to Bart. However, the first floor could be anywhere within the (first floor) premises, but to you what Jim is really saying, as per your interpretation it means the "front steps." Even if you don't have all the facts from Jim, and his reasoning behind the statement? But, the evidence to which Jim displays speaks for them self so to say?
Below, is merely an example, nothing more than comparing the two statements, an ingenuous representation of two very similar cases presented before a body of judges.
It's kinda like me saying, and you may quote me on this "On January 19, 1977 the prosecuting attorney said he could not determine a successful means of prosecuting Edwin Kaiser, because he was unable to determine where the venue should be held. (Now, that's funny!) However, the truth is outlined at the top of this document shown only in the book dated February 11, 1977. (Forgive me if I don't post the document here, I'm just merely comparing our two analysis.) "On January 19, 1977, Miami [instructed] matter to be closed" as venue could not be determined. Is this how the United States Government releases their assassins? This cable was dated four days [after] my father was killed. The CIA had successfully retrieved my father's briefcase."