23-06-2017, 04:01 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-06-2017, 04:26 AM by Scott Kaiser.)
I like to think of myself as someone who shoots from the hip kind of guy sorta say, a person who will just tell it like it is without the bullshit, truth is, some folks will tell you it's raining while peeing on your leg.
Linda Minor is NOT the second best researcher, she's second to none in researching, (top notch,) and the only researcher I would listen to very closely, in person and through cyber communication. She is and would be the only person I could count on for accurate, honest, true information. She is the most levelheaded person I've ever met, unlike many other researchers, they add more cream to their tacos just to beef up their stories.
I love, love, love the fact that she allows the readers to judge for themselves on all points of view. The evidence she discloses and tries to bring to light is not always black and white, there appears to be some gray in the middle as she bestows her vast information before an audience of readers. She's to the point, no nonsense person is what she is, and it's not my opinion, but these are the facts.
When I read her information it reminds me of two things, one, she's asking questions in her write up so the readers may characterize what they believe is really going on, it doesn't mean she's clueless or she's unaware as to what's going on, it means she knows and understands what's going on by her own definition, and she's also allowing the reader to visualize what they believe is going on.
And, secondly, what shes done as far as her findings reminds me of a person who was/is trying to justly tell his story, (in the same manner,) by asking questions in his publication. It doesn't mean he doesn't understand or not know what's going on, on the contrary, (he does,) it's just that without solid proof he would rather present his circumstantial evidence through a series of questions that allows the readers to make up their own mind as to what they believe is really going on! Bravo Mrs. Minor! Great work, though a publisher would consider passing on the material because it presents a few questions. However, I'd rather express the story through a series of questions, than to create a story that has no questions, as if I knew everything, as if the story itself is not worthy of any fact finding evidence, perhaps, circumstantial evidence can be just as compelling than finding that needle in a haystack?
She truly is one of a kind! And, I mean that with total sincerity.
Linda Minor is NOT the second best researcher, she's second to none in researching, (top notch,) and the only researcher I would listen to very closely, in person and through cyber communication. She is and would be the only person I could count on for accurate, honest, true information. She is the most levelheaded person I've ever met, unlike many other researchers, they add more cream to their tacos just to beef up their stories.
I love, love, love the fact that she allows the readers to judge for themselves on all points of view. The evidence she discloses and tries to bring to light is not always black and white, there appears to be some gray in the middle as she bestows her vast information before an audience of readers. She's to the point, no nonsense person is what she is, and it's not my opinion, but these are the facts.
When I read her information it reminds me of two things, one, she's asking questions in her write up so the readers may characterize what they believe is really going on, it doesn't mean she's clueless or she's unaware as to what's going on, it means she knows and understands what's going on by her own definition, and she's also allowing the reader to visualize what they believe is going on.
And, secondly, what shes done as far as her findings reminds me of a person who was/is trying to justly tell his story, (in the same manner,) by asking questions in his publication. It doesn't mean he doesn't understand or not know what's going on, on the contrary, (he does,) it's just that without solid proof he would rather present his circumstantial evidence through a series of questions that allows the readers to make up their own mind as to what they believe is really going on! Bravo Mrs. Minor! Great work, though a publisher would consider passing on the material because it presents a few questions. However, I'd rather express the story through a series of questions, than to create a story that has no questions, as if I knew everything, as if the story itself is not worthy of any fact finding evidence, perhaps, circumstantial evidence can be just as compelling than finding that needle in a haystack?
She truly is one of a kind! And, I mean that with total sincerity.