CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’

[Peter Lemkin]

Having thought a bit more about the piece and the site on which is shows up as an exclusive, it is very much like the true stories written to look fake in such 'newspapers' as the National Inquirer in the USA and their clickbait equivalents on the internet. This morning I looked to see how far the story had spread. Not far! One person made a youtube video about the article and added in footage long known to support the story, generally. Two others were repeating it verbatim and that was it so far. No real 911 analysts nor websites have picked it up or commented on it - and no one else has tried to interview this man. At this point, only further interview of this man might lend more credence to his story [that HE was involved and that the CIA was and in that building only]. Again, while they certainly would have been privy to what was going to happen before and even more so what happened, after the fact - I have never felt that CI, as an agency, was prime in the events of that day at all. It is true that CI and other intelligence agencies had rented large parts of WTC-7 [along with IRS, Smith Barney, Secret Service, SEC, American Express, NYC office of Emergency Management and a few other tenants], but that really didn't offer easier access of explosives and timers, etc. - as the same was done in the much more public and larger WTC 1&2. On reflection, while basically true [WTC7 brought down by controlled demolition], the focus on CI is IMO wrong and misleading and this is like the multitude stories floated about what happened in Dallas - containing a kernel of truth and misleading in part to add to the confusion. A modified limited hangout most likely or perhaps an invented (if basically true) scenario by the author to pad his pay at the clickbait site. Strange, but the 'usual' strangeness. Unless this 'dying man' answers more specific questions or provides further proof of his employment there is nothing to hang one's hat on, even if the basic story as presented is true and infinitely truer than the 'official' explanation. I also find it very difficult to believe that the all the WTC buildings wouldn't have been wired and planted for demolition by the same group. Lastly, there is nothing to say that a writer of clickbait stories can't have a good grasp of what happened on 911 and invent a story around that - or that as many of us suspect - that many clickbait writers are in league with propaganda interests of the country. One other interesting thing I noticed today is that going to several sites to find the list of tenants in WTC7 by floor - EVERY one of them differed and by a LOT. Almost none of them listed CIA, although I have seen authoritative research in the 911-Truth community that outside of Langley, this was the largest CIA office in the country - they didn't list their presence in the lobby, but apparently used another tenant as cover. They had many floors and used only a few for themselves - the rest really being CIA. The only thing the CIA has admitted on this is that in the days after the collapse of the many towers, CIA personnel were allowed to search on the pile of rubble for recovery of classified materials on paper and digital media. From here the CIA did 'work' on/in the U.N. and many foreign and likely some domestic entities - of which many important ones exist in NYC and the area. If, however, they had actually worked to set up the demolition, then they would have prior removed all important documents and computers, etc. - and crews to clean up the pile would not be necessary...but that could have been a cover story to stop any suspicion of their involvement in the demolition. In the murky world of intelligence and covert operations, clarity and being able to believe official statements is low to nil. However, spooks of all kinds WERE on the pile in the hours and days after the collapses/explosions hunting for all nature of things [to find other's secrets; to hide their own; and to hide the footprints and evidence of an inside job. Some proof of this by Sonnenfeld forced him to flea for his life to Argentina. As complex a covert operation as Dallas was, 9-11 was perhaps 1000 times more complex and even more massive in the shear amount of potential evidence [mostly promptly destroyed]. No one was able or allowed to get a handle on it when it was fresh and even now there is massive resistance from the powers that be - the usual pattern. 19 Arab terrorists did it for OBL [many still alive; many with US and foreign intelligence and military connections; having received money from intelligence sources; and no proofs they even boarded the flights; lives totally at odds with 'jihadis', clearly planted 'evidence' to make them suspect, etc.] - and no one need look any further. HA!