27-07-2017, 01:42 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:This has not been handled very well in a number of ways.
First, why was the date moved up to July from late October?
Especially why was it moved up if they were not ready? Because they have released documents which are still being withheld in full. Plus there are King documents in the batches. And some withheld documents are not being released yet.
Secondly, it is pretty clear that many of these should not have been withheld at all. They are not legally exempted. The exemptions as I understood them were dealing with an agent in place, or an ongoing operation. Many of these documents cannot claim that. The ARRB is not looking good right now.
The sum of all fears is slowly rearing its ugly head. One step forward, two steps backward. IMO that's been the predictable strategic ploy all along, a "limited hangout" dose of non-consequential crumbs amid a crafty smoke-screen of legitimacy.
It's too bad that men like Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, etc. aren't available in this modern age to take a certain Agency to task about the proper ranking of the People versus the State.
Your keen observations, Mr. DiEugenio, regarding the curious move up date; the sprinkling of King documents in the batches; and the realization that what's being "released" does not even bear any significance anyway is indicative of someone not so easily fooled.
Their self-serving tactics only serve to further incriminate the real culprits behind the coup d'état carried out on Friday, November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas.
Mr. Kaiser makes a legitimate point at the built in clauses that may prevent some revealing revelations from ever seeing the light of day. Sadly, the Langley Liars are "investigating" themselves... f#$%!@ clowns.