Where the heck is Albert Doyle?

[Tom Scully]

I haven't seen any posts from Albert Doyle for a couple of months. What is the official explanation for this? I want to hear from the moderators. Please provide specific details and reasons.

I've been a member of this forum about 6 months and it's been plain to me all along that this is Jim DiEugenio's turf. His sycophants abound here, and that is not always a healthy situation. With loyalty comes a loss of intellectual independence- a loss of the critical thinking skills so necessary for constructive debate. A loyalist becomes no better than a bully when his leader makes mistakes in judgment. And then this here Athenian democracy degenerates into a high-school clique- whose bigshots metamorphose into a modern-day Warren Commission. Bigshots who in reality are just a pack of nobodies, making monumental decisions that will affect the future of all 7 nonresearchers who read these forums, for about 20 seconds anyways.

It's also plain to me that Jim DiEugenio does not like Albert Doyle. My opinion is that this has plenty to do with Doyle's apparent suspension. It sure looks to me that the moderators here, acting as Jim's underlings, gave Doyle the boot to keep Jim happy. This is particularly distressing as DiEugenio has drifted closer to the Murphyite propagandists, and this circumstance has increased his friction with Doyle...

Dawn Meredith,

You have inadvertently proven one of my points ("With loyalty comes a loss of intellectual independence") by jumping in to Jim DiEugenio's defense, apparently before your morning coffee kicked in. Because I did not complain about Doyle's banishment, but rather about his suspension.

And my choice of "His sycophants abound here" was probably unfair- longtime friends is better phrasing. But the end result is the same. What we have here is a high-school clique all over again. And like it or not you are one of Deep Politics' modern-day Warren Commission......
........

Peter, is that you? I thought we are all supposed to post under our real names here. An exception to that rule was
carved out for Doyle,.... et tu, too? Nevertheless, maybe you are on to something, you hyper observant, uncomfortably frank, son of a gun! To your credit (if you are not Peter Janney posting as Richard) you have called Jim Di out.

I can't speak for anyone else, but you've called it as you see it and I for one can use your opinion as an excuse to cut down
on my own sickeningly obvious "man worship" of Jim DiEugenio. Indeed there is a more praiseworthy being to give me an
excuse to get up every morning and lavish praise on, of course I am talking about our beloved president Trump.

An reliable example of a sycophant, compared to your analysis of the dynamic on this forum.:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/...jfk-forum/
John Simkin Posted June 9, 2013

.........However, to my eternal shame, I did not protect Peter Janney enough when his book Mary's Mosaic was published in 2012. What made it worse was one of his main tormentors was one of our moderators, Tom Scully...........

Tom Scully Posted August 21, 2012
..........
I don't see that I've influenced John Simkin to post that Nina Burleigh's book was a "CIA limited hangout" or Doug Horne to "deduce" that a Professor Emeritus at California State, East Bay (formerly Cal. State Hayward) was operating in 1964 as, or was a 25 years long cover for a CIA assassin because Leo Damore left word that he was, and Peter Janney published it as fact.

On ‎11‎/‎7‎/‎2011 at 9:35 AM, John Simkin said:
......
One of the important aspects of this book is that it will show that Nina Burleigh's book on the subject, "A Very Private Woman: The Life and Unsolved Murder of Presidential Mistress Mary Meyer" (1998) was a CIA limited hangout.

Actual examples of trolls trolling:

You are not going to come out and admit in plain language you've been impersonating your deceased father and the mentally ill WC witness Ralph Yates, posting under both of their names, but the overwhelming evidence demonstrates
that you have been impersonating Albert and Ralph, Mr. "Hendrix expert."

Look more closely at the evidence I have presented. On this forum, Doyle is called out by Drew for posting elsewhere as Ralph Yates. Albert is shown to be participating in a discussion with Yates, http://jfk.education/yates/
.........

Brian Doyle - The Education Forum

educationforum.ipbhost.com › Home › Brian Doyle

https://twitter.com/realDonaldDicta/stat...4769267712

I have had the feeling, don't really know why....that there is entirely too much cliquishness here and so
I have pulled back from posting lately. What do you propose should be done to remedy the atmosphere here?

https://books.google.com/books?id=_uUuAg...ey&f=false

......Well it just goes to show
Things are not what they seem
Please, sister......

Something to think about.:

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...post113040
......
The problem is that the entity takes advantage. You post under your real name, as do I. The entity posts under his deceased father's name on this forum,
and, since earlier this month under his own name on the other forum.
Last edited by Tom Scully; 09-27-2016 at 02:01 AM.

09-26-2016, 08:31 PM
#20 Jim DiEugenio

Excuse me, but may I kindly remind us all that this was supposed to be about Mr. Doyle's observations and, I hope, his pictures of Dealey Plaza.

It would be nice if he would post some of those photos since I think it is an endlessly interesting venue to point out certain things.

My favorite picture is from the trestle which overlooks the entire location.

How any Secret Service man, or policeman could have looked at that and then approved the final motorcade route is simply astounding.

But from the latest info in Palamara's book, the alteration was not made until the night before.

Another of my favorites is from behind the fence at the end of it, over the storm drain. Absolutely perfect shot from the front--which is why Gary Mack avoided it in his ITTC.
Last edited by Jim DiEugenio; 09-27-2016 at 07:06 PM.

..........Dawn Meredith 10-25-2016, 02:34 PM

Jim During my first visit to DP Erick actually went down the storm drain. It made me furious as I was so emotional being there and -though it was not his intent- him doing this seemed to make light of the assassination.

Yes I want to see pics too.

Tom, I GET the point. I am just tired of seeing it made every time he posts.

Some advice, Richard....Peter, or for that matter, Doyle....think first, post later.....hope that advice helps.

The "Albert Doyle" Operation: Evidence and Conclusions - Deep ...

https://deeppoliticsforum.com › Forum › JFK Assassination

1. Cached
   

Dec 4, 2012 - 10 posts - ‎4 authors
[PHIL DRAGOO's intellect and poetic sensibilities are well known to the vast ... I have reviewed my initial commentary of Albert Doyle a work in ...