29-11-2017, 05:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 29-11-2017, 05:31 AM by Cliff Varnell.)
Jim DiEugenio Wrote: Its important as an unprecedented evolution in this case.
But it isn't significant as proof of a shot from the front -- which we've always had.
Let's see, they put the jury to sleep with the provenance of CE399, the acoustics, the NAA -- so the other major rabbit hole is the head wound/s evidence. That'll do the trick!
JFK may have been shot in the head 3 times. There may have been pre-autopsy surgery to the head.
The head wound/s evidence is far inferior to the back/throat wound evidence.
The best place to start in the defense of Lee Harvey Oswald is with the FBI report on the autopsy which tells of a shallow entrance wound in the back below the shoulders, and the autopsists were "at a loss" to explain the absence an exit wound, and no bullet.
Bona fide jury grabber.
The State is going to accuse Lee Harvey Oswald of shooting JFK with a 6.5 FMJ from a Mannlicher-Carcano but the wound in the back was shallow, and they didn't find a bullet.
The wound pattern in the FBI autopsy report is radically inconsistent with a shot from the MC.
The back wound was too low to have been associated with the throat wound, establishing the throat wound as an entrance.
The corroboration for the FBI report of the autopsy includes the physical evidence (clothing defects), at least 15 witness statements, and the properly prepared medical evidence.
This could be presented to a jury in less than an hour.
State has no proof that JFK was shot in the back of the neck as per the SBT -- not in the bogus autopsy report nor bogus autopsy photo which put the back wound at T1, still too low.
They can't replicate the SBT, and cannot challenge the FBI report on the autopsy.