02-12-2017, 12:59 AM
Blah, blah blah Cliff.
You have been saying the same thing about this case for years, probably decades. Even people on our side disagree with you, like Pat Speer.
In a court of law, which is what Simpich, Tanenbaum and Schnapf were in, you would have to prove the falsity of the autopsy photos, not simply alteration. That would take time, in fact you would probably have to call for an evidentiary hearing which would take days to prepare for and probably a day to try.
Now, you also agree with Chris Davidson that the Z film is altered, as you said over on EF. So your case would now entail two evidentiary hearings. (I think they are called 402 hearings in California.)
The hearing on the Z film, in my opinion, would take over a week.
So at your mock trial, that would last about three weeks: go for it buddy. Maybe you can raise the money by some of those films you have on You Tube.
You have been saying the same thing about this case for years, probably decades. Even people on our side disagree with you, like Pat Speer.
In a court of law, which is what Simpich, Tanenbaum and Schnapf were in, you would have to prove the falsity of the autopsy photos, not simply alteration. That would take time, in fact you would probably have to call for an evidentiary hearing which would take days to prepare for and probably a day to try.
Now, you also agree with Chris Davidson that the Z film is altered, as you said over on EF. So your case would now entail two evidentiary hearings. (I think they are called 402 hearings in California.)
The hearing on the Z film, in my opinion, would take over a week.
So at your mock trial, that would last about three weeks: go for it buddy. Maybe you can raise the money by some of those films you have on You Tube.