15-01-2018, 03:44 PM
Maybe soon I can figure out how this software works. Since I have Me and Lee by Baker on my top 10 books list, here's why:
(1) Baker clearly was using some sort of method the source of was not quite clear. She couldn't have remembered every act of every morning noon and night of a three month period 50 years ago. Maybe she had a diary which she didn't want anyone to know about for legal reasons or security reasons. Maybe she dramatized or fictionalized some stuff about going to a certain restaurant on a certain day, etc.
(2) Her information about the weaponized cancer research project is backed up by Ed Haslem in Dr. Mary's Monkey. Haslem's father was a medical school professor in New Orleans at the time.
(3) Baker is sometimes accused of going through the facts of LHO in New Orleans and fictionalizing a role for herself to explain all the missing and unknown facts, such as Oswald's whereabouts on each day, etc.
(4) The point is that Baker explains the missing facts on an airtight basis. Whether her narrative is bare bones or embellished to me is secondary.
(5) The facts she accounts for are as many as 100. The big one is her explanation as to why Ed Butler and Dr. Alton Ochsner went to DC to testify while Oswald was still in jail on 11-24-63. This, of course, is on record.
(6) She also explains why LHO was "applying" for the job in the Mental Hospital 100 miles from his home and didn't drive a car.
(7) She explains the details of what Oswald was doing in working for Reily Coffee Company. This includes the reason why Garrison reported that his NOLA witnesses were hired away from Reily Coffee and sent to NASA to shield them from testimony.
(8) The main reason (I think) people are Judyth V Baker deniers is that The Ochsner Clinic is such a big deal in New Orleans today. Its just too shocking to believe that Ochsner was an American Dr. Mengele.
(9) At worst, Me and Lee is another book like "Treason For My Daily Bread." "Treason" by Lebedev presents the only detailed portrayal of how the real issues over in Europe translated to the murder of JFK all the way over to Dallas. It's a unique rendition of "on the ground" operations. It's the only fairly accurate portrayal of the central process of the assassination issues and chain of events. Although fictional, the author clearly had some inside knowledge or extremely depthy research. Either way, it is what it is and it's extremely valuable to understanding the JFK murder.
(10) According to my factor analysis using books as the variable, Me and Lee closely correlates to other books which link New Orleans suspects such as On The Trail by Garrison and Heritage of Stone by Garrison. So Judyth V. Baker is working with exactly the right set of NOLA characters. How she fits them together may be slightly flawed or embellished in a certain way but that is apparently for literary and rhetorical reasons, i.e. in order to best tell the story, not to mislead anyone about the plot or as to who is guilty. And frankly, there may be no embellishment or exaggeration at all. It may be hard to know the exact answer to that question.
(1) Baker clearly was using some sort of method the source of was not quite clear. She couldn't have remembered every act of every morning noon and night of a three month period 50 years ago. Maybe she had a diary which she didn't want anyone to know about for legal reasons or security reasons. Maybe she dramatized or fictionalized some stuff about going to a certain restaurant on a certain day, etc.
(2) Her information about the weaponized cancer research project is backed up by Ed Haslem in Dr. Mary's Monkey. Haslem's father was a medical school professor in New Orleans at the time.
(3) Baker is sometimes accused of going through the facts of LHO in New Orleans and fictionalizing a role for herself to explain all the missing and unknown facts, such as Oswald's whereabouts on each day, etc.
(4) The point is that Baker explains the missing facts on an airtight basis. Whether her narrative is bare bones or embellished to me is secondary.
(5) The facts she accounts for are as many as 100. The big one is her explanation as to why Ed Butler and Dr. Alton Ochsner went to DC to testify while Oswald was still in jail on 11-24-63. This, of course, is on record.
(6) She also explains why LHO was "applying" for the job in the Mental Hospital 100 miles from his home and didn't drive a car.
(7) She explains the details of what Oswald was doing in working for Reily Coffee Company. This includes the reason why Garrison reported that his NOLA witnesses were hired away from Reily Coffee and sent to NASA to shield them from testimony.
(8) The main reason (I think) people are Judyth V Baker deniers is that The Ochsner Clinic is such a big deal in New Orleans today. Its just too shocking to believe that Ochsner was an American Dr. Mengele.
(9) At worst, Me and Lee is another book like "Treason For My Daily Bread." "Treason" by Lebedev presents the only detailed portrayal of how the real issues over in Europe translated to the murder of JFK all the way over to Dallas. It's a unique rendition of "on the ground" operations. It's the only fairly accurate portrayal of the central process of the assassination issues and chain of events. Although fictional, the author clearly had some inside knowledge or extremely depthy research. Either way, it is what it is and it's extremely valuable to understanding the JFK murder.
(10) According to my factor analysis using books as the variable, Me and Lee closely correlates to other books which link New Orleans suspects such as On The Trail by Garrison and Heritage of Stone by Garrison. So Judyth V. Baker is working with exactly the right set of NOLA characters. How she fits them together may be slightly flawed or embellished in a certain way but that is apparently for literary and rhetorical reasons, i.e. in order to best tell the story, not to mislead anyone about the plot or as to who is guilty. And frankly, there may be no embellishment or exaggeration at all. It may be hard to know the exact answer to that question.