Poyle

[Scott Kaiser]

And yet, they were still able to point out Oswald within minutes AFTER the assassination, do you understand what it is I'm saying here? Within minutes, let me repeat myself so it sinks in, WITHIN MINUTES of the ASSASSINATION it was REPORTED to WASHINGTON DC that OSWALD was in Mexi.

Habba good day!

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html...PageId=164

{sigh}

Scott...

what does pointing out that the FBI, STATE and ONI received a number of cables explaining how LEE OSWALD appears on a transcript and was photographed (but not really)

If both the FBI and CIA knew that the Mexico trip was a charade and that Oswald was in Dallas with Odio at the time, of course there would be concern over "Mexico" on the 22nd.

Truly, Hill, Sawyer, Westbrook and others steer the DPD to Oswald and vice versa...


How does any of that support POYLE having been where you claim? it doesn't.

David, I'm not sure how familiar you are with reading this document, but, if I can help in any small way, I will. First, the document starts off by saying, "Mexi standing by meet Poyle and provide him ticket for first available flight" The document is dated October 17, 1963, the ONLY other time POYLE was in Mexi AFTER October 17, 1963 was on November 21, 1963, so... Are you saying that was his first available flight
No, it wasy "first available flight MNTY" Scott... Monterrey.

His "stay may be brief" is talking about a FUTURE event.... AFTER the 17th of Oct.... after he gets a flight related top Monterrey ... why do you butcher the meaning of these words so?

Keep in mind the document is dated the 17th of October, seven days AFTER Oswald allegedly visited Mexi. Someone maybe POYLE may or may not insist on something, but someone will instruct him, may be POYLE this will not be done, (past tense). Something WAS done, and someone may insist on something, but... He is to be instructed it will NOT be done.

Scott... Oswald was placed in Mexico between Sept 26 and Oct 3rd... Oct 17th is over 2 weeks after that... I appreciate what you WANT this to say... but it doesn't.

Perhaps, can switch plans in October.... "but [present] need meet Poyle" assuming the author is not saying like (before) past tense, prior, and here we go! Prior possible contact with [*****] POYLE, meaning PRIOR TO THE 17th, prior has nothing to do with the future unless the prior altered the future. In this case it did, POYLE who is the same height as Oswald, I believe they both stood at 69 inches, and represented Oswald is why my father showed Poyle the photos in the first place.

"Mexi standing by MEET POYLE" that is something that takes place in the future Scott... "Will FIRMLY instruct him this not be done" FUTURE TENSE SCOTT... <will do> is not something in the past


Most secure in handling this job, what job do you know of that is considered TOP SECRET, has never been disclosed before, a month before the president gets killed and where Oswald is suppose to be, tell me, please be honest, have you or ANYONE for that matter ever heard the name POYLE before?

Now you're just throwing out generalities and suppositions... there are many many names out there with which no one is familiar. The documents so far do not place POYLE in MEX prior to the 17th of Oct... If you have something that corroborates that thought... post it.... "MAY BE" is a future tense meaning after the 17th... why would POYLE need to be there on the 21st or 22nd for a brief stay?

"As it possible POYLE stay Mexico may be extremely brief under above plan" let me repeat that again word for word so there's an understanding, or may be, you're not reading between the lines, in this case, the authors words. "As it possible POYLE stay Mexico may be extremely brief under above plan"

Interesting enough, someone always has got to be right, and of course debate truth, when it cannot be discredited. Have you ever thought that to be interesting too? In your first argument you say; "Dont be condescending Scott... I posted the doc for you based on your interest in the man" Are you saying you did all this for me? Common now, what you really did was point out what you thought you read, and you were so anxious in providing your thoughts, just one thing... How the hell can you pull apart a few photos, but you can't read a document?

You argue Poyle was in Mexico AFTER October 17, 1963, and yet cannot read the word [prior] as I've pointed out to you and now you want me to provide the summary/recap found in Poyle's file of November 17-23 regarding Dallas, which I've already done, sorry if you missed it, but pulling a Tom or Peter on me isn't going to work, may I suggest you keep your eyes open?