Scott Kaiser Wrote:Damn, almost forgot what I really wanted to say, and that is, in 50 years from now, when I'm dead and gone, some great researcher will no doubt use Scott Kaiser's information, put it all together, and admit to finding out who Richard Poyle really was, might as well give that person in the future some kudos eh?
For your sake, Mr. Kaiser, I hope you and your research will garner the respect you seek. That said, best wishes!
PS: Admittedly, I'm relatively new to the research community (once was dubbed "Rookie of the Year" by someone bearing the initials DM over at another forum, where I initially broke into researching this case in the Summer of 2014. Haven't been back since. He rarely if ever agreed with me on anything...even placed me in something called the CT camp. Have learned many new things since then. Said that to say this, in spite of his new kid on the block hazing, I was open then, and am open now to ALL researchers and their contributions (including yours).