Death of the lunchroom hoax

[Alan Ford]

Alan -

Something to know about CE1381... they were from a set batch of questions designed to say next to nothing while giving the impression Oswald could have done it...

1. "WHO" is making the voluntary statement
   
2. Describe yourself
   
3. Where were you on Nov 22 when JFK rode by
   
4. Do you know Lee Harvey Oswald and did you see him "at the time of the shooting" (since no one sees him he could be the shooter)
   
5. Did you see anyone who attracted your attention around the TSBD
   
6. What happened after the shooting
   
7. I have read and confirm this statement is true
   

Sometimes the answers to 2 or 3 questions are contained in one paragraph... but for the most part this was part of the glossing over of the evidence...

Who is missing though... could be interesting... it's in alphabetically order so..... ::

What is the image you posted below? what does the full image look like?

and waht does *AF 1248 @ 77% mean?

thanks
DJ


Self-reminder: work on this image after Valentine's Day next week through Passover, and develop a definitive Blog Post in the Spring, continuing w/An Open Examination of the only male figure unaccounted for in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381, and why his presence is essential to establishing the truth in the JFK Assassination ----->


*AF 1248 @ 77%

Spot On!, Mr. Josephs, in your keen assessment of the slanted questioning of the Texas School Book Depository employees as compiled within Commission Exhibit 1381. Yes, the questions were obviously drawn up in such a manner to lead to a determined outcome in order to FRAME an innocent party. Just for the fun of it, I'm going to pretend to answer your questions to demonstrate how the fix worked ---->

1. "WHO" is making the voluntary statement (Alan Ford, 123 Any Street, Irving, Texas)
   
2. Describe yourself (4th floor publishing gopher for Scott-Foresman)
   
3. Where were you on Nov 22 when JFK rode by (standing on the corner of Elm & Houston w/John Smith a fellow co-worker)
   
4. Do you know Lee Harvey Oswald and did you see him "at the time of the shooting" (since no one sees him he could be the shooter) No, I did NOT see the scoundrel, thus HE did the shooting, because he mumbles a lot and sticks to himself, f'ing commie loving traitor)
   
5. Did you see anyone who attracted your attention around the TSBD (No, no stranger could be guilty of this crime...again, I saw everyone else and their mother, but NOT Oswald)
   
6. What happened after the shooting (After our initial shock, my coworkers and I returned inside. Again Oswald nowhere to be seen, and, Oh, lest you didn't read it the first time, we did not see any strangers or OSWALD)
   
7. I have read and confirm this statement is true (Do I get a cold glass of milk & chocolate chip cookies for steering the focus upon only Oswald who was NOT seen/accountable, yada, yada, yada)
   

Very perceptive of you to fully understand where these questions were headed. The image posted is of an individual standing upon the front entrance stairs--mere seconds after the gunsmoke cleared in Dealy Plaza. My understanding here is ace card researcher Sean Murphy dubbed him something or other, but--out of respect for this Forum--I'm staying clear of that subject and simply referencing him as the only male figure unaccounted for in the CE 1381 log.

The AF ='s my initials, and the numeric number makes reference to a designated file. The @ 77% means if I wish to develop this image further I'll have to go to Kodak in Rochester, NY.

Again, a keen observation @ how the questioning of the employees were so cleverly designed to reach a contrived outcome.

Just curious to hear what others may think about an eyewitness who continues to give conflicting testimony @ Roy Truly...What's your take, Mr. Josephs, on eyewitnesses who always find themselves revising their "truth"?, especially amid Discussions off the record?