10-02-2018, 07:42 AM
Richard,
I am convinced that reliable evidence, derived from sworn statements/testimony, that LeeOswald was encountered by ML Baker and RS Truly on the 2nd floor of the TSBD Building, in the lunchroom, at approximately 12:31:00pm/12:32:00pm CST, on 11/22/'63. And, I am equally convinced, that reliable evidence, derived from sworn statements/testimony, that Ms SarahStanton and Ms PaulineSanders, were among the known occupants of the TSBD Elm St entrance top step/landing at the time of filming, likely at approximately 12:30:30pm/12:31:00pm CST, on 11/22/'63. It appears to me quite likely that Ms Stanton was just to BuellFrazier's right at said time, looking toward Elm St and the motorcade.
I am thus far unable to embrace any picture enhancement for evidence, but I believe there are identifiable unenhanced indications for study.
And, I have not been "inspired" about said subject by DuncanMacrae, and I am quite unfamiliar with his work.
Any disagreement with my conclusions is fine, but I have yet to determine the reliability of evidence presented in an attempt to disprove said conclusions.
Also, I remain committed to avoid claiming that now deceased eyewitnesses are "liars".
I am convinced that reliable evidence, derived from sworn statements/testimony, that LeeOswald was encountered by ML Baker and RS Truly on the 2nd floor of the TSBD Building, in the lunchroom, at approximately 12:31:00pm/12:32:00pm CST, on 11/22/'63. And, I am equally convinced, that reliable evidence, derived from sworn statements/testimony, that Ms SarahStanton and Ms PaulineSanders, were among the known occupants of the TSBD Elm St entrance top step/landing at the time of filming, likely at approximately 12:30:30pm/12:31:00pm CST, on 11/22/'63. It appears to me quite likely that Ms Stanton was just to BuellFrazier's right at said time, looking toward Elm St and the motorcade.
I am thus far unable to embrace any picture enhancement for evidence, but I believe there are identifiable unenhanced indications for study.
And, I have not been "inspired" about said subject by DuncanMacrae, and I am quite unfamiliar with his work.
Any disagreement with my conclusions is fine, but I have yet to determine the reliability of evidence presented in an attempt to disprove said conclusions.
Also, I remain committed to avoid claiming that now deceased eyewitnesses are "liars".
Larry
StudentofAssassinationResearch

