Death of the lunchroom hoax

[LR Trotter]

I never said he was proven male either...

What I said was it is not possible to make out buttons on a coat based on the digital info there... Period.

Now there are 7 of them ? Sorry LR but your fighting your own battle.... Deal with the info in Richard ' s work.

Has any of his photo assumptions been corroborated? Any of the math?

They are waiting for better copies to examine? What does that tell you about the conclusions from the images we've seen?

I don't see how it could be Oswald either... Doesn't make that a 5 foot 2 inch woman... Sorry.
And Mr. Ford makes perfect sense questioning the basis of Richard's work... That Truly and Baker would NEVER make anything up... or be directed to testimony by the FBI OR DPD.

It's as if the rest of the case didn't scream cover up and were asking you to suspend belief here... Truly lied his butt off...

Baker counters a police chief suggestion by starting a sentence, catching himself and saying well, he knew better.

If you're going to pick a fight, stay on topic. The work is my problem, not Prayerperson... PP.

::pullhairout::

What? Exactly what are you, Mr Josephs, talking about? Pick a fight? Explain that! What is meant, Mr Josephs by "your fighting"? What post of mine are you, Mr Josephs, referencing? Stay on topic? Explain that! Did you read the post just ahead of mine, by Mr Ford? Did you see Mr Ford's "photographic?exhibition"? And you say, "And Mr Ford makes perfect sense questioning the basis of Richard's work". So, David Josephs, are you saying that you endorse Alan Ford's assertions? What "work" of mine do you have a problem with? Seeking clarification? Seeking reliable provable evidence? Or, are you, Mr Josephs, among those that tend to believe that anyone and everyone disagreeing with you have to be wrong about anything and everything?