17-03-2018, 07:31 PM
Sorry, this is the post:
the film was not seen as a film until 1975...
what's left can be argued - and has been argued - that it is not conclusive IN THE CONDITION IT WAS OFFERED
Fast forward 30 years and everyone has desktop software which can do things that were impossible back then... there was no OBVIOUS anything... Dub'ya here illustrates the prime problem with the 99%... they apply 2018 thought to 1963 circumstances
TODAY it is most obvious the Zfilm was altered and does not represent the in-camera original....
What Dub'ya just can't understand is something called
I N T E L L E C T U A L C U R I O U S I T Y
Never had it, never will have it.... he likes to be TOLD OVER AND OVER since he can't be bothered to LEARN.
![[Image: default_blow.gif]](http://content.invisioncic.com/r16296/emoticons/default_blow.gif)
the film was not seen as a film until 1975...
what's left can be argued - and has been argued - that it is not conclusive IN THE CONDITION IT WAS OFFERED
Fast forward 30 years and everyone has desktop software which can do things that were impossible back then... there was no OBVIOUS anything... Dub'ya here illustrates the prime problem with the 99%... they apply 2018 thought to 1963 circumstances
TODAY it is most obvious the Zfilm was altered and does not represent the in-camera original....
What Dub'ya just can't understand is something called
I N T E L L E C T U A L C U R I O U S I T Y
Never had it, never will have it.... he likes to be TOLD OVER AND OVER since he can't be bothered to LEARN.
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter