27-06-2018, 04:16 AM
Quote:though apparently embellished with a lot of questionable detail
That's one way of putting it. Telling stories and lies is another - if they're 'embellishments' and 'questionable' the suggestion is that Baker knows those details aren't true but is putting them into the books anyway.
If she's lying throughout the text, why am I supposed to believe anything she says again? Walt Brown's detailed takedown has made it clear that tremendous amounts of her first book are fiction.
If Baker wasn't peddling lies for profit, no one would be too concerned with the fact that she writes a lot of books on the case. Pushing bullshit is a concern though, whoever does it.