Barbara Honegger - Behind the Smoke Curtain: What Happened at the Pentagon on 9/11

[Peter Lemkin]

It is not just these two positions - or the official lies. I think some of what BH says is interesting and important and a few parts may be incorrect. Personally, for reasons I'm not going to detail, but have before, I believe planes [at least two] were flown NEAR the pentagon, but at least one pulled up and over just at the last minute.....the other certainly did not cause the damage to the building and may or may not have crashed into it some minutes later. The damage was done by a bunker-buster rocket consistent with the size of the initial hole and breakthrough hole and all damage in between. These have depleted Uranium nosecones and explains the hazmat suits people were seen wearing with masks. Whatever planes and rockets were flown certainly were under computer control. The amount of debris is NOT consistent with a plane hitting - nor is the damage to the building [more so the initial damage]. The Pentagon, like the WTC, was a magic show and what you 'saw' was not what you 'got'. The inconsistent stories of witnesses - especially inside the building and the discrepancies with timing and pattern of destruction are key clues. The fact that no passenger plane could hold together to do that flight at the end is another - and does not fit [at all] the pattern of damage to the building. The photos BH showed is different the then one showing the small round hole before the collapse - and I don't know how to explain her photo in time, perhaps intermediate or after second impact. Of course those who have access to the many CCTV cameras, the radar reports and why the AA missiles that protect the Pentagon did not fire would know much of this mystery - but are silent to the public. It is not surprising given the entire day was an inside job and a magic show of deceits and tricks for the eyes. I'm most suspicious of the autopsy reports from that day. We know the taxi driver lied about the lamp posts and they most likely were brought down by something other than what made the round hole. Nothing fits - the firemen doing all the wrong and strange things, the perfect lawn, the small amount of debris, the small hole and then the collapse of the wall [likely pre-planted explosives - perhaps nanothermite as at WTC], the punchout hole no plane could make after six walls and many steel-reinforced concrete pillars...and one can go on. Lies and a magic show. Only a bunker-buster missile of large size could have done what was done. Other damage was done by pre-planted explosives before and after impact. Location of impact is very suspicious as are the movements and words of Rumsfeld.....


This is not the best article and set of videos on the Pentagon being hit by a missile, but it is OK for starters. I'll try to find better and post. https://consciouslifenews.com/911-prove-...e/1145271/