25-10-2018, 06:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 25-10-2018, 08:03 AM by Paz Marverde.)
Quote:But no, you offered a one line post early in the thread saying that the book looked like disinformation, and here we are on page three of the thread clarifying what my points were in my original post.
Paul Brancato at the JFK Education Forum - who read the Skorzeny book and apparently found it of interest - is reading Metta's book now and says it is 'incredible research, and very important'. If future posts in this thread could remain on the general topic of Metta's work here, it would be a great help.
Thank you very much, Anthony.
I add that Oliver Stone praised Metta. Jim DiEugenio praised Metta. Very recently, DiEugenio even added, once again in the Education Forum: "Permindex/CMC was just what Garrison thought it was many years ago. And that is why Clay Shaw was on the board and that is why he later tried to hide his association with that body. And we have it sourced in so many ways now that it's ridiculous: State Dept docs, Bloomfield archives, and this book [by Metta]."