11-02-2019, 09:37 PM
Proponents of the lunchroom hoax have never addressed Marvin Johnson's report, not to my knowledge. In it Baker is credited- twice- with recognizing Lee Harvey Oswald. The guy who he described in his affidavit as "walking away from the stairway."
There's no ambiguity regarding that recognition. It proves that the lunchroom encounter actually happened.
And the entire litany of hoax mis-interpretations of ambiguous evidence is adequately explained in Death of the Lunchroom Hoax.
I'll let you in on a little secret. I had Jim DiEugenio and Larry Hancock- endorsers of the hoax- specifically in mind when I wrote the 1st paragraph of the 2nd page:
"The Murphyites' widespread and pernicious beliefs have metastasized into the highest echelons of so-called assassination experts, many of whom are so entrenched from so many years in their misbegotten position, that they have grown constitutionally incapable of admitting their error, of even processing the information that shows their mistake. This stems from their emotional and intellectual immaturity, common character defects in a community that is rife with epic stupidity."
DiEugenio and Hancock have made a colossal mistake mis-interpreting the lunchroom evidence, and are too immature to own up to it. They're more interested in "How's this going to reflect on me?" than in the future of the community's scholarship. There's no saving face on this issue, and this lunkhead error will sting them for the remainder of their careers.
There's no ambiguity regarding that recognition. It proves that the lunchroom encounter actually happened.
And the entire litany of hoax mis-interpretations of ambiguous evidence is adequately explained in Death of the Lunchroom Hoax.
I'll let you in on a little secret. I had Jim DiEugenio and Larry Hancock- endorsers of the hoax- specifically in mind when I wrote the 1st paragraph of the 2nd page:
"The Murphyites' widespread and pernicious beliefs have metastasized into the highest echelons of so-called assassination experts, many of whom are so entrenched from so many years in their misbegotten position, that they have grown constitutionally incapable of admitting their error, of even processing the information that shows their mistake. This stems from their emotional and intellectual immaturity, common character defects in a community that is rife with epic stupidity."
DiEugenio and Hancock have made a colossal mistake mis-interpreting the lunchroom evidence, and are too immature to own up to it. They're more interested in "How's this going to reflect on me?" than in the future of the community's scholarship. There's no saving face on this issue, and this lunkhead error will sting them for the remainder of their careers.