24-03-2019, 05:09 PM
None of the Murphyites have stepped forward to respond to the evidence presented in Marvin Johnson's report. This report shows definitvely that their complaints about the inaccuracies in Baker's affidavit- which they've built their whole lunchroom hoax around- amount to no more than sophomoric cherry-picking. The man described as "walking away from the stairway" is the same man Baker recognized in that small interrogation room. And even the inaccuracies occurred after 6 lawmen barged into that room and interrupted Baker's train of thought.
The Murphyites could contact Ian Griggs, via hoax-friendly UK Dealey Plaza, and ask him to weigh in on this. Griggs is a retired detective and one of the most solid and respected JFK researchers ever to come down the pike. Are they afraid of his professional opinion?
They will find from him that I have been correct about the reality of the lunchroom encounter all these years. And that their underhanded Bolshevik tactics cannot save them here.
Sean Murphy's legion of fair-weather followers were fooled by his base of knowledge about the JFK case, but like him, they lack the analytical skills to separate fact from fiction. His deluded hypothesizing succeeded in wasting his followers' most precious resource- their time.
And for pointing out his obvious alcohol-abuse problem, I received a 2-week suspension from the Education Forum. Which became, without warning, a 2-years and counting ban. The EdForum's Bolshevik administrator, James Gordon, was more appalled by my blunt characterization than Murphy's profound sin of wasting thousands of hours of peoples' lives. This Bolshevik is more interested in attracting gullible followers to Murphy's faulty theories than he is with resolving JFK truth. That's why he eliminated Murphy's leading critic from the discussion.
Recently he opened a thread about banned EdForum members. He says that they can't be mentioned by name. Nor can their work be mentioned. (That includes mention of my website.) When asked to provide a list of banned members, he says he can't do that right now.
This Bolshevik demagogue, James Gordon, lives in the once-proud nation of England, which has no protected right to free speech. And he tailors the discussion about a murdered American president so that it will fit his own personal biases. These biases have extended every allowance for the propagation of Murphy's delusional hypotheses. Logic is not required, only cheerleading for Murphy's brilliance.
Brilliant researchers are a dime a dozen in JFK research. Correct research is what counts.
James Gordon's day of reckoning will come when the 6th-floor digital scan of PrayerMan becomes widespread knowledge and a finger-pointing howler. This issue will expose his ineptitude. He'll attempt to put a bit of "English" on the community's reaction to shield himself from public humiliation.
The Murphyites could contact Ian Griggs, via hoax-friendly UK Dealey Plaza, and ask him to weigh in on this. Griggs is a retired detective and one of the most solid and respected JFK researchers ever to come down the pike. Are they afraid of his professional opinion?
They will find from him that I have been correct about the reality of the lunchroom encounter all these years. And that their underhanded Bolshevik tactics cannot save them here.
Sean Murphy's legion of fair-weather followers were fooled by his base of knowledge about the JFK case, but like him, they lack the analytical skills to separate fact from fiction. His deluded hypothesizing succeeded in wasting his followers' most precious resource- their time.
And for pointing out his obvious alcohol-abuse problem, I received a 2-week suspension from the Education Forum. Which became, without warning, a 2-years and counting ban. The EdForum's Bolshevik administrator, James Gordon, was more appalled by my blunt characterization than Murphy's profound sin of wasting thousands of hours of peoples' lives. This Bolshevik is more interested in attracting gullible followers to Murphy's faulty theories than he is with resolving JFK truth. That's why he eliminated Murphy's leading critic from the discussion.
Recently he opened a thread about banned EdForum members. He says that they can't be mentioned by name. Nor can their work be mentioned. (That includes mention of my website.) When asked to provide a list of banned members, he says he can't do that right now.
This Bolshevik demagogue, James Gordon, lives in the once-proud nation of England, which has no protected right to free speech. And he tailors the discussion about a murdered American president so that it will fit his own personal biases. These biases have extended every allowance for the propagation of Murphy's delusional hypotheses. Logic is not required, only cheerleading for Murphy's brilliance.
Brilliant researchers are a dime a dozen in JFK research. Correct research is what counts.
James Gordon's day of reckoning will come when the 6th-floor digital scan of PrayerMan becomes widespread knowledge and a finger-pointing howler. This issue will expose his ineptitude. He'll attempt to put a bit of "English" on the community's reaction to shield himself from public humiliation.