24-10-2009, 04:22 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:In answer to your question: Adamski wasn't real. It is a well known hoax.
From which the obvious conclusion can be drawn about UFO's and 911, I think.
Adamski as hoax? Yes.
Majority of "saucers" and other UFOs explainable as very human technology with connections to Nazi-sponsored projects? Yes.
UFO phenomena as central components in multiple intelligence operations including mind control and propaganda efforts? Yes.
Strong likelihood that the 9-11 UFO is best understood as an intel op? Yes.
Conclusion valid that all otherwise unexplained UFO phenomena are attributable to human activity? No.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene

