12-11-2019, 02:29 AM
Maybe the lies have an element of truth: maybe O'Neill sent Coulson to OKC ahead of the bombing/failed controlled demolition.
It's like why FEMA scheduled a disaster exercise in New York in the week of 9/11: because the real thing was on the agenda.
Once upon a time, before I knew I was going to be writing about this, I saw on the internet pictures of FEMA men in the North Tower after the plane hit, with rifles strapped on, barrels down, under their yellow FEMA-marked ponchos. The site suggested they were Army disguised as FEMA. I wonder if those pix are still kicking around, maybe on one of the more extreme 9/11 sites like Killtown or Let's Roll.
Thanks for the continued info. O'Neill is almost everybody's saint of choice now that he can't be questioned.
You know the FOIA releases on O'Neill available on Black Vault, right?
https://www.theblackvault.com/documentar...-on-91101/
It's personnel records, heavily sanitized, no disciplinary records related to his lost briefcase, no mention of the July 2001 New York Times story on the incident and the threatened future stories questioning his personal finances.
I don't think "Somebody had it in for him" as much as "He overplayed his role and now under the new administration's agenda he has to go." So in that sense, he was perhaps seen as a loose cannon and The Man Who Knew Too Much. Why else couldn't they kick him upstairs or trust him in the same cooperative role for a couple more years? Possibly he too much wanted to build an executive career on shouting, "It's UBL!" when he could do the same thing better disgraced and dead.
It's like why FEMA scheduled a disaster exercise in New York in the week of 9/11: because the real thing was on the agenda.
Once upon a time, before I knew I was going to be writing about this, I saw on the internet pictures of FEMA men in the North Tower after the plane hit, with rifles strapped on, barrels down, under their yellow FEMA-marked ponchos. The site suggested they were Army disguised as FEMA. I wonder if those pix are still kicking around, maybe on one of the more extreme 9/11 sites like Killtown or Let's Roll.
Thanks for the continued info. O'Neill is almost everybody's saint of choice now that he can't be questioned.
You know the FOIA releases on O'Neill available on Black Vault, right?
https://www.theblackvault.com/documentar...-on-91101/
It's personnel records, heavily sanitized, no disciplinary records related to his lost briefcase, no mention of the July 2001 New York Times story on the incident and the threatened future stories questioning his personal finances.
I don't think "Somebody had it in for him" as much as "He overplayed his role and now under the new administration's agenda he has to go." So in that sense, he was perhaps seen as a loose cannon and The Man Who Knew Too Much. Why else couldn't they kick him upstairs or trust him in the same cooperative role for a couple more years? Possibly he too much wanted to build an executive career on shouting, "It's UBL!" when he could do the same thing better disgraced and dead.