12-11-2019, 02:39 AM
Richard Booth Wrote:David Andrews Wrote:Maybe the lies have an element of truth: maybe O'Neill sent Coulson to OKC ahead of the bombing/failed controlled demolition.
It's like why FEMA scheduled a disaster exercise in New York in the week of 9/11: because the real thing was on the agenda.
Once upon a time, before I knew I was going to be writing about this, I saw on the internet pictures of FEMA men in the North Tower after the plane hit, with rifles strapped on, barrels down, under their yellow FEMA-marked ponchos. The site suggested they were Army disguised as FEMA. I wonder if those pix are still kicking around, maybe on one of the more extreme 9/11 sites like Killtown or Let's Roll.
Thanks for the continued info. O'Neill is almost everybody's saint of choice now that he can't be questioned.
Well, to my thinking, I believe that Coulson was there for PATCON and that PATCON is linked, in some way, to the Oklahoma City bombing. I believe McVeigh was in contact with one or more PATCON assets and one of them may have served a role as a provocateur, encouraging him. John Doe #2 disappeared real quick. Because John Doe #2 was probably an informant.
At the time Coulson wrote his book (1999), O'Neill was still alive. So presumably Coulson probably asked him if it was okay to "say you called me" when O'Neill probably knew full well Coulson was in OKC that morning and might well have been there himself if there was a major PATCON meeting going on. If O'Neill was connected to VAAPCON he could have been connected to PATCON as the two were related. VAAPCON was started primarily because of how successful PATCON was at the time. It was a spin-off of PATCON.
I added some stuff up above on O'Neill FOIA releases already available online.