Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Photo Analysis Skill Test
#2
The answer is:

Stancak fails to input the fact that Pauline Sanders' face is illuminated by sunlight...That tells you a lot about her position that Stancak fails to inform the reader over...Stancak fails to relate that if Sanders has her face illuminated in Altgens, and Z256 Wiegman was taken at the same time, that means she would necessarily have to have her face illuminated in Z256 Wiegman as well...Stancak gets around this by trying to place Tiny Face behind Shelley, therefore explaining why you can't see Tiny Face's face illuminated in Wiegman...However he makes another serious analysis mistake by doing this...Stancak foolishly fails to realize that Shelley's head continues upward from where the shadow cuts-off on his face...Stancak tells you that you can see Stanton's hair rise above the illuminated part of Shelley's face, however he fails to tell the reader that the rest of Shelley's head would occupy that space, therefore obscuring any such features that would be located behind Shelley...You would not be able to see the alleged features of Sarah Stanton's hair that Stancak claims because Shelley's head and hair would be in the way...Also, since Shelley was probably close to Lovelady's 5 foot 8 height that means the 5 foot 4 Stanton's hair would not be visible behind Shelley in Wiegman...Stancak shows gross incompetence by not registering this and trying to show faint patches as being things the other evidence precludes...You can't show the hair of a 5 foot 4 person behind someone who is 5 foot 8...Stancak shows a basic level of analysis incompetence with this that no one calls him out on...

Another gaffe Stancak commits is he fails to realize Bill Shelley is facing south in both Altgens 6 and Z256 Wiegman...Shelley is tracking the limousine just like Lovelady...They are both watching the limousine go down Elm St...Here is Stancak's quote from the article:


" b) Bill Shelley, the man wearing a dark suit and a tie has his gaze orientated eastward in Altgens6 (red contour) but westward in Wiegman still (orange contour). "



Stancak is confused and shows basic research incompetence here because he fails to register that he himself said that Altgens 6 and Z256 Wiegman were taken at the exact same time...Therefore Shelley cannot be looking towards Houston St in one image and the limousine in the other...If they were taken at the same time then they must show the same thing...The problem here is Altgens possesses the illusion that Shelley is looking at Houston St when in fact he is looking in the exact same southern direction as Lovelady as they track the limo...If Stancak had more photo analysis competency he would realize that if Shelley was looking east towards Houston St that the back of his head would obscure Tiny Face...Basic anatomy would prove this...These basic photo analysis calculations are things Stancak never makes and they render his research invalid...You can't be looking east and south at the same time...The current research community shares Stancak's incompetence and fails to detect these fatal flaws in his research...


Stancak's bias to force Tiny Face to be Stanton causes him to miss important evidence...He refuses to process that Tiny Face is in a direct line with Pauline Sander's position against the glass divider as discovered by Bart Kamp...If you draw a line of transit from Altgens to Tiny Face you will see that Tiny Face is in the exact position that Kamp discovered Sanders in in Darnell...Stancak does not inform his readers of the fact that Chris Davidson discovered Sarah Stanton's face on Prayer Man in the clear Wiegman frame...While Stancak is occupying your attention with false pseudo-science claims that Stanton is behind Shelley, he is not mentioning the fact that both Frazier and Lovelady placed Stanton in the Prayer Man spot at the time of both Altgens 6 and Wiegman 12...Lovelady specifically told the FBI that Stanton was "Next to him to the far right of the entranceway when the limousine passed the front steps"...That was 9 seconds prior to Wiegman and placed Stanton in the Prayer Man spot...Frazier made clear that after the assassination he was staring in shock at Stanton after she related that Gloria Calvery had said the president had been shot...Darnell shows Frazier staring at Prayer Man who is standing to the far right of the entranceway in that film too...The Hughes Film shows Prayer Man behind Lovelady at the far right of the entranceway when the limousine passed...Very simply, Stancak is using pseudo-science to avoid admitting all the evidence shows that Tiny Face is Sanders and therefore Prayer Man is Stanton...Stancak outright ignores Dennis Morissette's discovery of Stanton in the Owens Film that shows Stanton was Prayer Man's exact height...That same film shows that Stanton's elbow-length dress sleeve matches that of Prayer Man exactly...This is proof positive that the so-called research community reacts to with ignoring and silence...You can't be a credible research community and do that...At some point you have to identify intelligent correct evidence...Especially concerning a topic that has caused so much damage to the cause of Kennedy research...


" c) The location of Sarah Stanton possibly changed as well during the time elapsing between the instant when Altgens6 picture was snapped and Wiegman film frame W12. "



Again, Stancak is confused and shows gross incompetency since he himself said that Altgens 6 and Wiegman 12 were taken at the exact same time...Therefore Stanton cannot be sneaking behind Shelley like Stancak foolishly asserts...The reason why Stancak posits this silliness is because he's looking for an excuse for Tiny Face not having her illuminated face visible in Wiegman 12...He's trying to hide her behind Shelley because he can't come up with any other excuse...In other words he's making the evidence fit his claim rather than the other way around...Stancak is aware that Tiny Face is Sanders...There is Stancak saying in public that Stanton is moving and changing locations in between images that were taken at the exact same time, with the community saying nothing...If the images were taken at the exact same time then they have to show the exact same thing and no changing of location is possible...


Chris Davidson doesn't help matters...He could apply his digital enhancement process to Z256 Wiegman and Hughes in order to clarify some of this but he doesn't because he looks at it politically and doesn't want to disprove his friends...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 11-05-2023, 05:38 PM
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 12-05-2023, 05:34 PM
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 13-05-2023, 05:25 PM
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 19-05-2023, 02:47 PM
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 23-05-2023, 03:00 PM
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 25-05-2023, 04:16 PM
Photo Analysis Skill Test - by Brian Doyle - 26-05-2023, 03:37 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Detailed discussion and analysis of the H&L evidence David Josephs 105 325,831 24-08-2020, 03:26 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  The Dealey Plaza Test Nick Lombardi 17 21,682 15-01-2017, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Joseph McBride
  The Selectice Service card photo Drew Phipps 26 28,907 08-08-2016, 05:37 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Dartmouth Study of Backyard Photo supposedly confirms authenticity Tom Bowden 38 25,765 08-07-2016, 02:11 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  New article on Neutron Activation Analysis Tracy Riddle 2 4,150 29-01-2016, 08:22 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  Analysis of NPIC Briefing Boards Adam Kemp 10 14,858 27-01-2016, 06:03 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  Interesting new photos and photo analysis of the Plaza Peter Lemkin 0 4,675 08-12-2015, 07:36 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Dartmouth does 3D study of backyard photo Drew Phipps 10 14,315 20-05-2015, 03:22 AM
Last Post: Bob Prudhomme
  FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades Richard Coleman 1 3,212 21-04-2015, 03:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  UPDATED RESEARCH: Front Throat Shot Research Analysis "Z225" / Contact for free copy Anthony DeFiore 0 2,854 28-12-2014, 04:48 PM
Last Post: Anthony DeFiore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)