28-07-2023, 02:29 PM
James Gordon is getting away with referring to myself as a person he gave "chance after chance" to come forth and obey his moderation who then didn't correct his "antics" and was justly banned...
Gordon is a god-damned liar and any review of the thread I participated in will show that Gordon was making false methodology complaints against me and then saying I was refusing to listen...This could be verified by looking at the 2016 Prayer Man thread and seeing that I had committed no such violations...Gordon was doing undue influence and riding my back on every post I made...You can see that I was the only Education Forum member who was treated that way and given such intense moderation and that has held true ever since...You have to remember the context here is I presented the correct evidence that the Davidson enhancement and height analysis proved Prayer Man wasn't Oswald...So the correct context is Gordon failed to moderate competently or correctly and falsely accused me of methodology violations (the only person to be moderated to that extent) and then banned me before I could force my evidence...He is now falsely defaming me and abusing his moderator power to falsely portray me as a person who failed to practice rigor when told...This is all happening under the situation where I was the only person actually practicing correct rigor on the site and showing that indeed Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton...Gordon is now abusing his moderator position by lying and saying I was an uncooperative member who refused to heed moderation warnings who was "given chance after chance"...My evidence has since been sharpened and even further proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton but Gordon is not interested in the correct evidence or his responsibility for it as a moderator...So it is actually Gordon and the Prayer Man people he is flagrantly protecting through corrupted moderation who are guilty of what I was accused of...The 95% of Education Forum members I disproved are quite happy with Gordon's corruption because they know they are being shielded from having to admit wrongness on Prayer Man...Those people are ghouls because they don't mind in the least if it means the destruction of one of the best researchers they'll ever see on the Kennedy internet...The Kennedy internet is not about research...It's about who you know and who Jim D approves of...The research community is pretending that when the British-based Gordon and Parker ban me that they don't have to recognize the correct evidence...As if you could get away with hiding behind that cheap cowardice and censorship...You have to realize this is all being done by people who then turn around and say they represent a moral protest against the US Government not honestly recognizing the correct evidence in the Kennedy assassination...
Gordon is a god-damned liar and any review of the thread I participated in will show that Gordon was making false methodology complaints against me and then saying I was refusing to listen...This could be verified by looking at the 2016 Prayer Man thread and seeing that I had committed no such violations...Gordon was doing undue influence and riding my back on every post I made...You can see that I was the only Education Forum member who was treated that way and given such intense moderation and that has held true ever since...You have to remember the context here is I presented the correct evidence that the Davidson enhancement and height analysis proved Prayer Man wasn't Oswald...So the correct context is Gordon failed to moderate competently or correctly and falsely accused me of methodology violations (the only person to be moderated to that extent) and then banned me before I could force my evidence...He is now falsely defaming me and abusing his moderator power to falsely portray me as a person who failed to practice rigor when told...This is all happening under the situation where I was the only person actually practicing correct rigor on the site and showing that indeed Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton...Gordon is now abusing his moderator position by lying and saying I was an uncooperative member who refused to heed moderation warnings who was "given chance after chance"...My evidence has since been sharpened and even further proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton but Gordon is not interested in the correct evidence or his responsibility for it as a moderator...So it is actually Gordon and the Prayer Man people he is flagrantly protecting through corrupted moderation who are guilty of what I was accused of...The 95% of Education Forum members I disproved are quite happy with Gordon's corruption because they know they are being shielded from having to admit wrongness on Prayer Man...Those people are ghouls because they don't mind in the least if it means the destruction of one of the best researchers they'll ever see on the Kennedy internet...The Kennedy internet is not about research...It's about who you know and who Jim D approves of...The research community is pretending that when the British-based Gordon and Parker ban me that they don't have to recognize the correct evidence...As if you could get away with hiding behind that cheap cowardice and censorship...You have to realize this is all being done by people who then turn around and say they represent a moral protest against the US Government not honestly recognizing the correct evidence in the Kennedy assassination...