25-03-2024, 05:24 PM
On the Education Forum Michael Crane called Sandy out for slipping and showing the site's gross double standard when Larsen called someone an "infantile goofball"...Crane is right and there is one standard for the sanctimonious moderators under that pompous ass Gordon and one for everyone else...Mark Knight did the same thing when he called me a "shit-poster"...Apparently the moderator class are allowed to call people derisive names however members are subjected to royal judgment for the same thing and banned for life for being "too insulting"...The dirty mods hijack the subject before the point is ever answered...That's the real offense here...In Knight's mind if you violate your own rules and call someone a "shit-poster" you don't have to answer for banning the guy with the correct evidence...Welcome to the Education Forum Railroad...Excuses come before facts...
It is pathetic to see Sandy Larsen sign on to this when anyone knows it originates from that horse's ass Gordon and is just an extension of his pompous subjective use of manners and politeness to enforce his aggressive moderation...It is pathetic to see Larsen pretend everything is on the up and up and telling Hargrove that my submission for re-instatement went through the normal processes and that I had failed and everything was right - knowing the whole time that my application was processed by the same people who committed the violation in the first place and that my life banning would be upheld because I called Kathy Beckett a bad name on another website where the context of that does not uphold censorship of my very important evidence...Those dishonest people are ignoring that I said that about Kathy AFTER I was unfairly banned for posting the correct evidence and she came over to McAdams' newsgroup to taunt me about it...It is pathetic seeing a wrongful ban being upheld because some people do not want to admit they were wrong and that I had refuted the Prayer Man theory...That's the real reason I was banned and the real reason lies are being used to permanently uphold it...
Sandy Larsen is a staunch Prayer Man advocate and that is part of the reason why he was groomed for administrator...He gave no resistance to that woefully unfair ruling that was obviously based on retaliation and personal resentment...He is pretending that everything was right and that I was denied by fair process so with him being moderator, and my being banned for life on bullshit, all is right in the research world...Under Larsen/Gordon the correct Prayer Man evidence will never see the light of day on the Education Forum...Larsen is perfectly happy serving under that son of a bitch Gordon whose actions are based mostly on pitiful stupidity, cowardice, and favoritism rather than sound moderator judgment or rules enforcement...Gordon is an abusive moderator who abuses his power as moderator to carry out personal grudges and prevent the Prayer Man theory from being refuted on his website and Larsen volunteers all too willingly in that process...That ignoramus Gordon is playing king-maker and Sandy knows what the deal is...Which is why his blithe passing along of my rejection is wickedly pathetic...Once inside the clique moderators can freely commit abusive insults however ordinary members have to endure being called to the rug for lectures on how bad it is to say "ignoramus" or how it violates their higher sensibilities when the real Freudian Slip over why they have issues over the word "ignoramus" is bursting through the prison bars of their hypocrisy - and it ain't because I called Kathy a bad name...
Recently I was banned from Tony Krome's "Jacks" website when I demanded the Prayer Man people answer to the woman's dress neckline recently found on Prayer Man (Sarah Stanton) in Darnell...When I posted that I signed on the next day and got a message that I was banned...There seems to be a trend for UK-based moderators to not sense the drastic conflict between that and alleged Kennedy advocacy...These people are flagrantly using their moderator power to use censorship to avoid admitting the correct evidence on Prayer Man...They have seriously damaged credible JFK research and have forced a situation that is equivalent to Cinque and Fetzer being in charge and forcing their way...There's only so much fact that bullshit excuses can deter...
It is pathetic to see Sandy Larsen sign on to this when anyone knows it originates from that horse's ass Gordon and is just an extension of his pompous subjective use of manners and politeness to enforce his aggressive moderation...It is pathetic to see Larsen pretend everything is on the up and up and telling Hargrove that my submission for re-instatement went through the normal processes and that I had failed and everything was right - knowing the whole time that my application was processed by the same people who committed the violation in the first place and that my life banning would be upheld because I called Kathy Beckett a bad name on another website where the context of that does not uphold censorship of my very important evidence...Those dishonest people are ignoring that I said that about Kathy AFTER I was unfairly banned for posting the correct evidence and she came over to McAdams' newsgroup to taunt me about it...It is pathetic seeing a wrongful ban being upheld because some people do not want to admit they were wrong and that I had refuted the Prayer Man theory...That's the real reason I was banned and the real reason lies are being used to permanently uphold it...
Sandy Larsen is a staunch Prayer Man advocate and that is part of the reason why he was groomed for administrator...He gave no resistance to that woefully unfair ruling that was obviously based on retaliation and personal resentment...He is pretending that everything was right and that I was denied by fair process so with him being moderator, and my being banned for life on bullshit, all is right in the research world...Under Larsen/Gordon the correct Prayer Man evidence will never see the light of day on the Education Forum...Larsen is perfectly happy serving under that son of a bitch Gordon whose actions are based mostly on pitiful stupidity, cowardice, and favoritism rather than sound moderator judgment or rules enforcement...Gordon is an abusive moderator who abuses his power as moderator to carry out personal grudges and prevent the Prayer Man theory from being refuted on his website and Larsen volunteers all too willingly in that process...That ignoramus Gordon is playing king-maker and Sandy knows what the deal is...Which is why his blithe passing along of my rejection is wickedly pathetic...Once inside the clique moderators can freely commit abusive insults however ordinary members have to endure being called to the rug for lectures on how bad it is to say "ignoramus" or how it violates their higher sensibilities when the real Freudian Slip over why they have issues over the word "ignoramus" is bursting through the prison bars of their hypocrisy - and it ain't because I called Kathy a bad name...
Recently I was banned from Tony Krome's "Jacks" website when I demanded the Prayer Man people answer to the woman's dress neckline recently found on Prayer Man (Sarah Stanton) in Darnell...When I posted that I signed on the next day and got a message that I was banned...There seems to be a trend for UK-based moderators to not sense the drastic conflict between that and alleged Kennedy advocacy...These people are flagrantly using their moderator power to use censorship to avoid admitting the correct evidence on Prayer Man...They have seriously damaged credible JFK research and have forced a situation that is equivalent to Cinque and Fetzer being in charge and forcing their way...There's only so much fact that bullshit excuses can deter...