Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Moderator Sandy Larsen
#7
Larsen is now posting how to put people on ignore over on the Education Forum...It isn't the duty of any credible moderator to advise people how to put members on ignore...I say this as a researcher who was subjected to such action by the wayward researcher David Josephs who posed himself as an expert on Prayer Man and talked down to me prior to my 7 year banning for posting the correct evidence on Prayer Man...I was warned by the DPF moderator that I "wasn't listening to the experts" prior to my banning...Josephs was openly posting that Oswald was Prayer Man and backing Greg Parker's bullshit - which was against this forum's rules...Josephs just so happened to be dead wrong and he never apologized to me...That's the get out of jail free card that is so convenient for clique members...This ignore feature is mainly used for abusive mob actions like was done against me with Prayer Man with none of the main offenders ever apologizing for that grave injustice...The ignore feature generally falls directly along the lines of the clique and it should never be promoted by any JFK research moderator...
 
There's not one Education Forum member who stands up to Larsen and tells him this like it needs to be said...No one asks Larsen if he would approve of the ignore feature being used against people who challenged him for posting Cinque's Gorilla Man theory like he did recently on the Education Forum...Or if Larsen would recommend the ignore feature being used against those who refuted the Prayer Man theory like is currently being done under his bogus moderation...The ignore feature is the gateway to flagrant censorship and denying of correct evidence by the clique...It is the weak crutch of those who can't back up their claims...In 2016 David Josephs made a similar thread advising people how to put members on ignore on the Deep Politics Forum...Under the moderatorship at the time there was a strict site rule that no member could be played that way and that each member was to be given equal respect and status by the moderators and that their claims were to be given serious consideration...In other words the site rules at the time forbade such cowardly moves exactly for the reason they were being used by Josephs...Yet they were promoted by the "super moderator" at the time with the secondary moderator threatening to put me on ignore if I spoke about it...If I asked him to please obey his own site rules exactly for the reason they were created...Since then the moderation at this website has removed those member-protecting rules in their reducing the site to read-only with no conversation or debate...
 
The JFK internet has been hijacked by a clique and no matter what kind of haughty bullshit they use to describe themselves they wait until the last move and they rule by mob...They may blow hot air like Gordon on how royal a standard they practice but Gordon is full of it and when the clique needs someone who disproved them silenced and banned he is more than willing to do the job...That group and its visceral mob standard is what Larsen is hailing to on the Education Forum...You will find that the people who approve of Larsen's cowardly action fall exactly along the exact same party lines of those who are ignoring my correct Prayer Man evidence...

The Deep Politics Board was first formed in opposition to this type of corrupted moderation on the Education Forum...It was openly declared in its public self description...What happened was a self-appointed mod worked with the Prayer Man people against the written purpose of this site and formed back-channel alliances with the Education Forum where I was snuffed out and the previous posture of DPF towards Education Forum tyranny was quietly forgotten...This betrayal has come at great cost to DPF and Kennedy research in general with Pat Speer bragging that DPF was for all intents and purposes a dead site...What I should have represented by the previous DPF rules was a favored son of the DPF's original purpose who had used DPF for what it was intended and disproved a crank theory that was corrupting the research community...I should have been hailed and supported according to my achievements...My Prayer Man research should have been seen as a victory for this website and its purpose...Instead I ended up getting banned by a mod who had placed his need to maintain the clique before serious gains in JFK research...My Prayer Man evidence led to my discovering one of the most important evidence discoveries in JFK Conspiracy research history...That discovery is being completely ignored and it is being ignored by the exact clique that Larsen is calling to with his call for censorship...It is being ignored by the same bridge-over to the Education Forum that was established with my banning and a deletion of the previous rules...No credible moderator calls for the ignoring of serious evidence...

God forbid that the Education Forum would ever be threatened by Oliver Twist (myself) ever getting up and asking Larsen to honestly answer how his call to put people on ignore would be used in the case of the Prayer Man theory where, under his moderatorship, the more than proven correct evidence is being ignored and its authors banned or how that would reflect on credible moderation and research standards that are the duty of any serious research moderator to respect and protect...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 05-11-2023, 07:07 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 31-01-2024, 10:24 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 25-03-2024, 05:24 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-03-2024, 07:20 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 09-04-2024, 06:09 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 31-03-2024, 06:18 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 09-04-2024, 07:42 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 10-04-2024, 06:28 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 10-04-2024, 04:33 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 11-04-2024, 06:02 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 11-04-2024, 06:31 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 11-04-2024, 07:02 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 12-04-2024, 05:12 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 12-04-2024, 06:38 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 15-04-2024, 06:00 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 15-04-2024, 05:08 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 16-04-2024, 05:48 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 16-04-2024, 06:41 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 16-04-2024, 11:36 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 17-04-2024, 05:53 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 22-04-2024, 07:34 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 25-04-2024, 04:55 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-04-2024, 06:12 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-05-2024, 06:38 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 28-05-2024, 04:57 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-05-2024, 12:03 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 30-05-2024, 02:53 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-06-2024, 03:48 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-06-2024, 04:05 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 04-06-2024, 04:03 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 07-06-2024, 12:54 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 07-06-2024, 04:15 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why Mark Knight Should Never Be Allowed To Be A Moderator Brian Doyle 6 1,160 14-06-2024, 05:15 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Would someone give this info to Sandy Larson at the Ed Forum please! Scott Kaiser 40 32,044 17-12-2016, 02:20 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)