Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Moderator Sandy Larsen
#8
(29-03-2024, 07:20 PM)Brian Doyle Wrote: You'll have to forgive me Mr Ford but I have real trouble believing that you really have the exact same name as the infamous MacRae website troll "Alan Ford"...I personally think your claim that you have the exact same name as that notorious troll is a prank designed to screw up the credible JFK research community, as is typical on the "JFK Assassination Forum" website that is run by the mentally ill host Duncan MacRae - who encouragingly hosts miscreants like yourself and persecutes skilled researchers like myself...This Deep Politics website has reached a new low because trolls like yourself used to be disallowed by rule...But we are really talking Jim DiEugenio giving you credibility so therefore you are allowed membership here on the forced silence forum...Alan Ford shows a good example of the demented subterfuge intentionally injected by Duncan MacRae of both backing and trolling the Prayer Man evidence at the same time...Duncan is a sick pup and he encourages nuts like Ford...Like ROKC, their main objective is sowing confusion and noise...

Quite honestly, Mr. Doyle, truth be told, admittedly I was initially taken aback upon learning that there was an individual posting as Alan Ford in 2018. Initially, I even thought it was a ruse to discredit my good faith efforts to simply shed some light, truth and justice on President Kennedy's untimely death. In spite of your reluctance to believe so, there are posters over on Mr. MacRae's website that are aware that I made my foray into JFK research way back in May, 2014. Hint: My avatar back then is something that confirms that. The old timers over on his website know exactly what it was. I don't share that image because it's one of the things that makes a distinction between myself and your Alan Ford, who you could learn a thing or two from if you cared to set aside your reluctance to learn from others time to time. Please, let's not disparage the good names of Ms. Becket, Mr. DiEugenio, Mr. Parker, or the gallant efforts of all the posters over at the ROKC forum

Your overly flamboyant trollish style gives you away Mr Ford and the reason both Sean Murphy and Greg Parker quit is because they both knew they were full of it and didn't really believe in their theories...The JFK internet has been successfully hijacked by the Prayer Man people so the key gatekeeping spots have been occupied by Prayer Man supporters and my evidence that Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton is being deliberately ignored at the expense of the credibility of the research community...Bullying and censorship is being used to enforce it by those gatekeepers...Bring Sean Murphy in to this thread and I will absolutely undress him naked with the correct evidence...No serious researcher walks away from such a potentially important piece of evidence...Both Gilbride and myself have exposed how Murphy & Kamp cherry-picked and avoided evidence...The Prayer Man case was an artificial creation upheld by Parker's troll farm and a false illusion created by censorship and excluding of evidence...Most internet researchers operate by wanting to be a part of the clique and not by objective research and rigor...You can thank that asshole Greg Parker for that...It is how the JFK internet is really moderated no matter how they describe themselves...James Gordon is an ignorant ass who should never be allowed anywhere near the level of power he has in the community and Mark Knight is just his ass-kissing yes-man with no integrity of his own...And Larsen just passes along their rotten judgments...

There you go again, rather than appreciate the sound and exemplary research conducted by others (Mr. Murphy, Sean; Mr. Parker, Greg, Mr. Kamp, Bart etc) you immerse yourself in disillusion far, far away from where the plain simple truth leads. The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.


You can spare us the trollish platitudes Mr Ford...We already proved Prayer Man was Stanton in 2016 by means of the Davidson Enhancement...That image clearly showed the chubby-cheeked female face of Sarah Stanton holding her purse up in front of her face...Since the research community is run by a goofy friendship circuit I paid a price for being skilled enough to out-argue 95% of the research community by being banned...It is not what you know on the JFK internet but a dumbed-down who you know and James Gordon was allowed to get away with murder by that dishonest 95% who were bailed-out of having to admit they were wrong...Gordon is crook so if he doesn't get you on evidence he'll figure out some pompous reason why you aren't worthy of board membership...

We will just have to respectfully disagree on Ms. Stanton. She's a woman, thus cannot be the male figure in Prayer Man's location outside on the steps of the main entrance to the TSBD.  As far back as 2013, Mr. Murphy (Sean) predicted the desperate measures some would take to even insinuate the male figure is a woman. 

The only thing the troll Alan Ford got right was the recent clear image from Darnell that showed a female dress neckline on Prayer Man...Sandy Larsen helped slide that evidence out of sight on the Education Forum and no member has honestly pressed it or demanded a response from the Prayer Man people for it...Larsen and the EF membership also scrolled Morissette's Owens Film image of Stanton out of sight as fast as possible and helped ignore it...That is opposite the definition of moderator where a moderator is supposed to see things like this and act on them for the sake of the board's credibility...It works opposite on the Education Forum due to that dirty crook Gordon and both pieces of damning proof were successfully dodged by the crooked moderators on that board...Sandy gave no resistance to Mark Knight's ruling that a life ban be enforced against me for calling Kathy Beckett a bad name...Knight never addressed the real issue of the importance of my correct evidence...Morissette's Owens Film image showed an elbow-length dress sleeve on Stanton that exactly matched the elbow-length dress sleeve on Prayer Man...If a photogrammetry analysis were done between Prayer Man and Stanton in Owens you would find that the body shape and height match perfectly and that Davidson, Darnell, and Owens are slam dunk proof that Prayer Man is Stanton...The only difference here is the stupidity and corruption of the moderators and membership...They keep a get out of jail free card always handy on their websites with their dirty moderators where the unspoken rule is the clique is always right, whether right or wrong...Larsen and DiEugenio are bums because they are perfectly comfortable with that - good research be damned... 

Oh, dear


The recent dress neckline is kryptonite to the Prayer Man trolls and I am being kept off the Education Forum by Knight because they are desperately trying to keep it off the board...They don't care about the evidence...The true mark of a shit-heel mod...

What next, Mr. Doyle, you saw a woman's heel and neckline during the recent total eclipse hanging off the Moon? C'mon sir, you're desperately reaching to prove a male figure is a female. The wrongly accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody. 

Mr. Doyle.

In spite of your reluctance to believe so here's My JFK Assassination Research Timeline...

Initial foray (May, 2014) then said my goodbyes to Mr. MacRae's website on New Year's Day, 2015 because at that time Mr. Mack (Gary) may he Rest In Peace, continued to bombard my PM Box with, quote, "Kid you got it all wrong", or "hey newbie you sound just like a rookie", etc.  to any new developments I attempted to share over there. I remember sharing about the puff of gunsmoke rising above the picket-fence area behind the grassy knoll and Mr. Mack's last straw for me was, quote, "wrong again newbie that's impossible since the shots came from the 6th floor not from behind the fence". 

Thus, excused myself from the JFK Assassination Research community for seven months until feeling comfortable enough to join this website (July, 2015) because it conveyed then and now that this membership was/is simply trying to shed light, truth and justice in this case...what a breath of fresh air.

Made an attempt to rejoin Mr. MacRae's website in November, 2018, where I had little choice but to add my middle initial as there was already an Alan Ford posting over there...that isn't me, Mr. Doyle, 

Mr. MacRae has the means, Mr. Doyle, to confirm that when I sign in it's from NY; and. also according to his Education Forum photo and location I have come to learn that Alan Ford lives abroad. Again, you can learn a lot from him. The only disagreement I have with him is we don't agree that the wrongly-accused is Mr. Murphy's Prayer Man figure. Will try to venture back next week, Mr. Doyle, perhaps by then you will come to the realization Sarah Stanton is not a male figure. 

It's waaaaay past time for truth, Mr. Doyle, the wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 05-11-2023, 07:07 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 31-01-2024, 10:24 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 25-03-2024, 05:24 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-03-2024, 07:20 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 09-04-2024, 06:09 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 31-03-2024, 06:18 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 09-04-2024, 07:42 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 10-04-2024, 06:28 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 10-04-2024, 04:33 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 11-04-2024, 06:02 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 11-04-2024, 06:31 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 11-04-2024, 07:02 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 12-04-2024, 05:12 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 12-04-2024, 06:38 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 15-04-2024, 06:00 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 15-04-2024, 05:08 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 16-04-2024, 05:48 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 16-04-2024, 06:41 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 16-04-2024, 11:36 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 17-04-2024, 05:53 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 22-04-2024, 07:34 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 25-04-2024, 04:55 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-04-2024, 06:12 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-05-2024, 06:38 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 28-05-2024, 04:57 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-05-2024, 12:03 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 30-05-2024, 02:53 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-06-2024, 03:48 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-06-2024, 04:05 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 04-06-2024, 04:03 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 07-06-2024, 12:54 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 07-06-2024, 04:15 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why Mark Knight Should Never Be Allowed To Be A Moderator Brian Doyle 6 1,160 14-06-2024, 05:15 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Would someone give this info to Sandy Larson at the Ed Forum please! Scott Kaiser 40 32,043 17-12-2016, 02:20 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)