Moderator Sandy Larsen

[Alan Ford]

You're a troll Mr Ford, as your trollish answers above show...You ignored the elbow-length sleeve in Owens matching the elbow-length sleeve on Prayer Man...You can't do that and still be credible...

On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, I haven't ignored the so-called elbow-length sleeve in Owens (Who is Owen & and What are you talking about?)

The only problem here is a lack of moderation to remove you from further trolling serious posts...

Trust me, Mr. Doyle, don't humour yourself, IF your posts were indeed serious, the exemplary moderation here on this site and elsewhere would have no issue with addressing me and/or anyone else if deemed necessary to do so sir. 

Recently someone (Davidson?) noticed that there was a clear frame in Darnell...Davidson used his digital filters to enhance the clearly-seen female dress neckline on Prayer Man in that image...If you go to my Prayer Woman Facebook page you will see that I even found the bottom edge of that same neckline in Murphy's more blurry Prayer Man frame from Darnell...That neckline and bare female chest skin is in both images and is a done deal...The Prayer Man people are using their corrupted control to ignore this and they are tolerating trolls like yourself...The research community doesn't want to admit the embarrassing fact that it went to mob mode when it banned me in 2016 for refuting Prayer Man...That mob is still in charge...

Please don't use Mr. Davidson's name in vain, because IF Mr. Davidson (Chris) had indeed noticed, quote, a clear frame in Darnell, unquote, he would do the honourable thing akin to the exemplary researcher he is and immediately shared his indisputable evidence that Prayer Man is indeed a female. Ask yourself why he hasn't done that, Mr. Doyle? Answer: You are making that frame "clear" to fit your self-serving narrative, nothing more, nothing less. Sarah Stanton isn't a male figure, Mr. Doyle, no matter how much you huff and puff sir. 

Sandy Larsen was appointed moderator on the Prayer Man-only Education Forum because Gordon knew he would back-up his Prayer Man bullshit dependably...

I disagree, Mr. Doyle, Has it ever occurred to you that Mr. Larsen (Sandy) inherited his duties due to his lengthy tenure as a member in good standing? Nothing more, nothing less, IF he was promoting your Sarah Stanton fantasy you wouldn't have any issues with him. Truth is, Mr. Doyle, you have a hard time admitting when you are wrong. Sarah Stanton isn't a male figure nor did she stand in his position atop those entrance steps to the TSBD. 

Kathy Beckett is a research non-entity and is only good for teasing the unfairly banned in order to bolster her social media relationships...She has no research skill or resume...She is the type who would let herself be used as an excuse to prevent a cracking of the case and isn't credible...You'll never see Beckett say "Don't ban that obviously important evidence on my account" and that is the main problem here...

On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, Ms. Beckett has more research acumen than you care to admit. 
I get that that's a fact that doesn't align with your fantasy about what you yourself deem as "important evidence". There was a time when I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, initially reasoning that you cared more about where the actual evidence would lead in this case as opposed to crafting phantom "evidence" to fit your self-serving narrative. 

Until next time, Mr. Doyle, I leave you with this quote from a man and musician you admire, in the hopes you care to listen & learn more moving forward as the JFK Research Community dares to shed light, truth and justice in this 60+ yrs old mystery surrounding the untimely death of a duly elected representative of the People on Friday, November 22, 1963...

"Knowledge speaks, but Wisdom listens" -- Jimi Hendrix