Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Moderator Sandy Larsen
#18
(12-04-2024, 06:38 PM)Brian Doyle Wrote: Alan Ford wrote:
" The Owens film does not represent any semblance to Mrs. Stanton. Lest you forget, Mr. Doyle, Mrs. Stanton's grand-daughter (W****) & I shared email exchanges. In one of those exchanges she shared pictures with me of Mrs. Stanton. The Owens film doesn't align with the excessive weight of Mrs. Stanton in 1963, nor does it align with her large girth and her expansive forearms either.  A bit of advice, not that you will take it, stop forcing the "evidence" to fit your self-serving narrative. "

You're nuts. The figure seen hugging the west side of the Depository front entrance is conclusively Sarah Stanton...You aren't credible if you think you can get away with not answering the fact that no member of the public would be allowed to stand in that position if they didn't have a reason to be there with all the cops you see in the same image...The person Morissette showed in Owens is very definitely Sarah Stanton and it is when she was allowed to leave after being interrogated on the second Floor...Morissette thinks it is 2pm...Wanda Daniel will most certainly confirm this despite Mr Ford's obnoxious trolling...

Wrong, A-G-A-i-N...

Mrs. Stanton (Sarah), may she Rest in Peace ---->

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/1524...ta-stanton

perhaps Mr. Doyle will cease using her good name as a candidate for an otherwise MUCH thinner male (the Prayer Man) figure. 


Even though you lie and say the figure doesn't represent Stanton anyone can see it is clearly Stanton from her white hair and chubby-ness...If you observe this link you will see the figure in Owens perfectly matches Stanton and shows her face on that woman and maybe even the same dress:

https://ibb.co/pnjvXWj

When was your last eye exam, Mr. Doyle, you are reaching again. 

The moderators on the JFK internet reserve the dirty trick of allowing obvious trolls like Alan Ford to chew you alive unopposed even though they are committing outright trolling like denying the woman in Owens is Stanton...Those moderators allow trolls like Ford to come in and troll that the woman isn't Stanton and then stand back and say nothing...There is no credible moderation or Peer Review on the Kennedy internet...
I cannot proceed when the opposition is allowed to lie and troll that the woman in Owens isn't Stanton...
Even though the Prayer Man people regularly post technical analyses on the Prayer Man photography they avoided doing so with Owens because they realized the woman in Owens would perfectly match Prayer Man in height and shape...Morissette was asking Davidson and Stancak to do such an analysis in his thread title and they declined...So much for "obeying correct evidence procedures when told"...

On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, the moderators are only interested in facts, not conjecture, gross assumptions, etc. amid a self-serving agenda sir. 

Larsen and Gordon dishonestly ushered that thread off the board as quick as possible and did not take responsibility for what it showed...

Or. Could it simply just be your broken-record has run its course, Mr. Doyle, facts matter sir. 

The JFK internet is organized around deliberate, strategic censorship and ignoring and isn't based on objective recognition of evidence...The clique...

Oh, dear

There you go again, attacking others when the real issue lays elsewhere. What part of facts matter don't you seem to get, Mr. Doyle? Why are you so desperately trying to put a female name to a male figure? Mr. Murphy (Sean) prophesized about researchers like you waaaay back in 2013. He was right then and he is right now. His brilliance/legacy lives on. When it came to the identification of Prayer Man, Sean had this to say, quote, "It's Him", unquote. Sarah Stanton is Not, Prayer Man, Mr. Doyle, she didn't even stand in Prayer Man's position on those front entrance steps. By her own volition she states she was on the opposite side of those entrance steps, her words, Mr. Doyle, not mine. Facts matter. 

Mr. Doyle,

Just a few questions for you to answer if you Dare:

(A) IF the Owens image is of Sarah Stanton as you claim, Why is she now wearing white rather than the dark clothing donning the male figure in the Prayer Man position? She cannot be in a dark dress with a noticeable hemline according to your self-serving narrative and then suddenly donning a white blouse...make up your mind, Mr. Doyle. 

(B) Why is Prayer Man's hair dark while Mrs. Stanton's in contrast is obviously white? Make up your mind, Mr. Doyle, you cannot have your cake and eat it too.

© Why is Mrs. Stanton's physique 3x the size of the Prayer Man male figure? Moreover, as he is captured in Mr. Darnell's (Jimmy) filming his forearms are 3x smaller than Mrs. Stanton's rather pronounced forearms, Why is that, Mr. Doyle? 

Both his forearms--in Darnell--put together don't come even close to just one of hers. Looking forward to you either ignoring these questions altogether as you cower away, Or, do what you do best and start playing musical chairs with timing sequences amid crafting a sudden crafty introduction of an onsite TSBD clothing-boutique-changing-booth. Facts matter, Mr. Doyle, dare you to answer the above questions. If you cannot, no great surprise, there's a reason for that. 

The wrongly-accused did not shoot anybody. Anybody.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 05-11-2023, 07:07 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 31-01-2024, 10:24 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 25-03-2024, 05:24 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-03-2024, 07:20 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 09-04-2024, 06:09 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 31-03-2024, 06:18 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 09-04-2024, 07:42 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 10-04-2024, 06:28 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 10-04-2024, 04:33 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 11-04-2024, 06:02 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 11-04-2024, 06:31 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 11-04-2024, 07:02 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 12-04-2024, 05:12 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 12-04-2024, 06:38 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 15-04-2024, 06:00 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 15-04-2024, 05:08 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 16-04-2024, 05:48 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 16-04-2024, 06:41 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 16-04-2024, 11:36 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 17-04-2024, 05:53 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 22-04-2024, 07:34 PM
RE: Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Alan Ford - 25-04-2024, 04:55 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-04-2024, 06:12 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-05-2024, 06:38 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 28-05-2024, 04:57 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 29-05-2024, 12:03 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 30-05-2024, 02:53 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-06-2024, 03:48 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 02-06-2024, 04:05 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 04-06-2024, 04:03 PM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 07-06-2024, 12:54 AM
Moderator Sandy Larsen - by Brian Doyle - 07-06-2024, 04:15 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why Mark Knight Should Never Be Allowed To Be A Moderator Brian Doyle 6 1,160 14-06-2024, 05:15 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Would someone give this info to Sandy Larson at the Ed Forum please! Scott Kaiser 40 32,044 17-12-2016, 02:20 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)