16-04-2024, 05:20 PM
You are using trollish wordsmithing to avoid giving any answer what so ever to the fact your troll farm director Parker got caught by his own researcher, Zambanini, fishing for likely candidates to deny the cop seen by Mrs Garner with Truly was Baker...Obviously Parker did his usual evidence-fucking and looked for a bogus figure he could swap in in his obvious make-it-up-as-he-goes-along attempt to deny Mrs Garner's witnessing...You are trolling Alan and you avoided giving any answer to the FACT that once you disprove that cop being Lumpkin, as Parker falsely asserted, then he becomes Baker and therefore proves the Lunch Room Encounter...Parker knew he was nailed dead to rights by myself so he squirmed back to his censorship-protected troll farm and quit the debate - like he did every single time I debated him on McAdams' Newsgroup...Like Parker, you dishonestly dodged the point and tried to troll around it with obnoxious wordsmithing...Once Lumpkin is refuted "THE" cop becomes Baker and in turn proves the Encounter...Garner said "THE" cop instead of "a" cop because she knew she was specifically referring to Baker...
Bonnie Ray saw Baker's helmet emerge above the boxes in sync with the timing for the Lunch Room Encounter...Your questioning that is just you trolling and nothing more...You failed to answer the point that the employees at the 4th Floor windows saw Bonnie Ray and the other negro workers arrive at the 4th Floor windows in sync with the Encounter...
You ROKC troll farm members are dishonest because the true context of Piper's testimony was a black worker was not about to give too much detail if he knew what was good for him...You are a dishonest troll Alan because you ignore the part where Piper said Truly was with a cop...In the meantime a voice stress analysis of Truly & Baker's CBS interview where they told of the Encounter would prove they were not lying...Your trolling ignores the recorded fact of all the pressure put on witnesses in the Depository and the subsequent lack of precise detail that followed...What your trolling is designed to conceal is the fact Piper never said that Truly didn't run in with Baker - which is what stands out the most for credible, non-troll researchers...What that weaseling punk Kamp and his foolish apologist DiEugenio are avoiding admitting is the fact that Baker left the Lunch Room Encounter off his 1st Day Affidavit because he knew it was Oswald's true location during the assassination and it exonerated him...DiEugenio and Kamp are failing to realize that this is evidence of when the cover-up started and they are committing a serious violation against good research under the protection of fools...
What your Greg Parker-based trolling is doing is ignoring the fact that Buell Frazier recently said on a radio show that an un-named employee told him that a cheese sandwich and apple were seen on the 2nd Floor Lunch Room table after the assassination...That partly-eaten lunch is obviously the same lunch that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald eating at that same table at 12:25 and corroborates her story...The research community prefers to destroy its own credibility by ignoring the fact that I have discovered one of the most important pieces of evidence in assassination research history in the form of Sarah Stanton's witnessing of Oswald waiting out on the 2nd Floor staircase landing for Mrs Reid to clear out the ladies from the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...This witnessing corroborates Carolyn Arnold and Frazier's witnessing of Oswald eating Lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room like Oswald told Fritz...Because it disproved Prayer Man, the Prayer Man-hijacked Education Forum ignored it and continued to protect people who posted the already-debunked Prayer Man theory...One of the most important evidence discoveries goes ignored by the Education Forum with the moderators saying name-calling is more important than solving the case with no member questioning that absurd lack of accounting or how it erases the best solving of the case...
When I was banned from this forum in 2016 Peter Lemkin said I failed to understand the "ethos" of this forum and that was part of the reason why I was banned...Since then someone has gone in and lobotomized the member-protecting Deep Politics Forum rules that should have protected my good claim and kept me from being banned...The rules were with me in 2016 when I made my protest that my correct evidence was being ignored by the moderators...Under the moderators back then it was ignored and I ended up getting banned for 7 years...Since then they have dropped the previously stated purpose of the site to challenge the unfair moderation at the Education Forum and by doing so, and dropping the DPF rules, have assisted the EF in its mismanagement of JFK research...So those who said they understood the DPF ethos better have since managed to make the board a research desert where intelligent discussion is discouraged and strict silence is enforced...Their interpretation of the DPF's ethos is to gut the site of its previous purpose and engineer a victory for the Education Forum through self-destruction...And now, to add insult to injury, a demented member of the worst troll-type websites (MacRae, ROKC) now has free access to the forum to post his Greg Parker, Bart Kamp-type trolling - as if it wasn't bad enough...James Gordon had good partners in the DPF moderation and now the site openly lends itself to the worst rat-fucking trolls...
Bonnie Ray saw Baker's helmet emerge above the boxes in sync with the timing for the Lunch Room Encounter...Your questioning that is just you trolling and nothing more...You failed to answer the point that the employees at the 4th Floor windows saw Bonnie Ray and the other negro workers arrive at the 4th Floor windows in sync with the Encounter...
You ROKC troll farm members are dishonest because the true context of Piper's testimony was a black worker was not about to give too much detail if he knew what was good for him...You are a dishonest troll Alan because you ignore the part where Piper said Truly was with a cop...In the meantime a voice stress analysis of Truly & Baker's CBS interview where they told of the Encounter would prove they were not lying...Your trolling ignores the recorded fact of all the pressure put on witnesses in the Depository and the subsequent lack of precise detail that followed...What your trolling is designed to conceal is the fact Piper never said that Truly didn't run in with Baker - which is what stands out the most for credible, non-troll researchers...What that weaseling punk Kamp and his foolish apologist DiEugenio are avoiding admitting is the fact that Baker left the Lunch Room Encounter off his 1st Day Affidavit because he knew it was Oswald's true location during the assassination and it exonerated him...DiEugenio and Kamp are failing to realize that this is evidence of when the cover-up started and they are committing a serious violation against good research under the protection of fools...
What your Greg Parker-based trolling is doing is ignoring the fact that Buell Frazier recently said on a radio show that an un-named employee told him that a cheese sandwich and apple were seen on the 2nd Floor Lunch Room table after the assassination...That partly-eaten lunch is obviously the same lunch that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald eating at that same table at 12:25 and corroborates her story...The research community prefers to destroy its own credibility by ignoring the fact that I have discovered one of the most important pieces of evidence in assassination research history in the form of Sarah Stanton's witnessing of Oswald waiting out on the 2nd Floor staircase landing for Mrs Reid to clear out the ladies from the 2nd Floor Lunch Room...This witnessing corroborates Carolyn Arnold and Frazier's witnessing of Oswald eating Lunch in the 2nd Floor Lunch Room like Oswald told Fritz...Because it disproved Prayer Man, the Prayer Man-hijacked Education Forum ignored it and continued to protect people who posted the already-debunked Prayer Man theory...One of the most important evidence discoveries goes ignored by the Education Forum with the moderators saying name-calling is more important than solving the case with no member questioning that absurd lack of accounting or how it erases the best solving of the case...
When I was banned from this forum in 2016 Peter Lemkin said I failed to understand the "ethos" of this forum and that was part of the reason why I was banned...Since then someone has gone in and lobotomized the member-protecting Deep Politics Forum rules that should have protected my good claim and kept me from being banned...The rules were with me in 2016 when I made my protest that my correct evidence was being ignored by the moderators...Under the moderators back then it was ignored and I ended up getting banned for 7 years...Since then they have dropped the previously stated purpose of the site to challenge the unfair moderation at the Education Forum and by doing so, and dropping the DPF rules, have assisted the EF in its mismanagement of JFK research...So those who said they understood the DPF ethos better have since managed to make the board a research desert where intelligent discussion is discouraged and strict silence is enforced...Their interpretation of the DPF's ethos is to gut the site of its previous purpose and engineer a victory for the Education Forum through self-destruction...And now, to add insult to injury, a demented member of the worst troll-type websites (MacRae, ROKC) now has free access to the forum to post his Greg Parker, Bart Kamp-type trolling - as if it wasn't bad enough...James Gordon had good partners in the DPF moderation and now the site openly lends itself to the worst rat-fucking trolls...