16-04-2024, 11:36 PM
You're just repeating the same questions over and over Alan...
It is well known in photography that certain cameras and film types will present light-colored objects as being dark in shade...The camera adjusts to the bright part of the subject field and therefore the contrast is skewed in the shade parts of the subject field, as seen in the Depository front entrance with its bright sun vs dark shade...We have already debated this and you ignored it every time I posted it (like trolls do)...You won't find any blond hair showing up in the dark/shade parts of Darnell because his camera and film is registering light-colored hair as dark, as seen with Stanton...
You practice a deceptive form of analysis Alan where you always stay on the offensive and must be asking the questions lest it becomes too clear that you are the one who has failed to answer the points...Because you make a bogus argument that white must appear white in shade with Darnell's equipment you avoid answering the fact that we can see Prayer Man pivot towards Frazier from Wiegman to Darnell...In Wiegman Prayer Man is facing forward towards the motorcade and in Darnell Prayer Man has turned towards Frazier...This pivot is the exact turn Frazier described Stanton as making at that exact time when she turned to tell him what Calvery had shouted...
Because you make a technically invalid argument that white must appear white you relieve yourself of having to answer the FACT that Altgens 6 shows everything to Frazier's left in clear detail...Therefore for your false claim, and misquoting of witnesses, that Stanton is to Frazier's left is provably false because if Stanton were to Frazier's left we would clearly see her in Altgens...But we don't...Even worse, if we go to Wiegman Z256 we can see the exact same scene in Altgens 6 taken at the exact same time from a 90 degree angle and Stanton is clearly not to Frazier's left...Every time I post this definitive proof you ignore it and repeat your same idiotic points...Altgens 6 and Wiegman Z256 prove that Stanton is not to Frazier's left...Every time I post this you ignore it and repeat your same trolling points...
Your idiotic points above do not make Lovelady's locating of Stanton to the far right of the entranceway go away...Nor does it make Prayer Man being in that exact spot in the Hughes Film go away...
A while ago your trolling doppleganger "Alan Ford" posted the sharp Darnell frame, that clearly showed a female dress neckline on Prayer Man, on the Education Forum...The forum did its best to ignore that obvious proof...If we could post that image here you would see that Stanton's dress neckline was seen on Prayer Man in that Darnell frame...No one is trying to clean up Owens to see if we can match that neckline with Stanton but it doesn't matter because several converging instances of evidence already proved Stanton was Prayer Man...
The above should be enough for any credible researcher to realize Prayer Man has been proven to be Stanton so anyone who is ignoring it in contempt in order to offer already-refuted regressive arguments should be moderated...
It is well known in photography that certain cameras and film types will present light-colored objects as being dark in shade...The camera adjusts to the bright part of the subject field and therefore the contrast is skewed in the shade parts of the subject field, as seen in the Depository front entrance with its bright sun vs dark shade...We have already debated this and you ignored it every time I posted it (like trolls do)...You won't find any blond hair showing up in the dark/shade parts of Darnell because his camera and film is registering light-colored hair as dark, as seen with Stanton...
You practice a deceptive form of analysis Alan where you always stay on the offensive and must be asking the questions lest it becomes too clear that you are the one who has failed to answer the points...Because you make a bogus argument that white must appear white in shade with Darnell's equipment you avoid answering the fact that we can see Prayer Man pivot towards Frazier from Wiegman to Darnell...In Wiegman Prayer Man is facing forward towards the motorcade and in Darnell Prayer Man has turned towards Frazier...This pivot is the exact turn Frazier described Stanton as making at that exact time when she turned to tell him what Calvery had shouted...
Because you make a technically invalid argument that white must appear white you relieve yourself of having to answer the FACT that Altgens 6 shows everything to Frazier's left in clear detail...Therefore for your false claim, and misquoting of witnesses, that Stanton is to Frazier's left is provably false because if Stanton were to Frazier's left we would clearly see her in Altgens...But we don't...Even worse, if we go to Wiegman Z256 we can see the exact same scene in Altgens 6 taken at the exact same time from a 90 degree angle and Stanton is clearly not to Frazier's left...Every time I post this definitive proof you ignore it and repeat your same idiotic points...Altgens 6 and Wiegman Z256 prove that Stanton is not to Frazier's left...Every time I post this you ignore it and repeat your same trolling points...
Your idiotic points above do not make Lovelady's locating of Stanton to the far right of the entranceway go away...Nor does it make Prayer Man being in that exact spot in the Hughes Film go away...
A while ago your trolling doppleganger "Alan Ford" posted the sharp Darnell frame, that clearly showed a female dress neckline on Prayer Man, on the Education Forum...The forum did its best to ignore that obvious proof...If we could post that image here you would see that Stanton's dress neckline was seen on Prayer Man in that Darnell frame...No one is trying to clean up Owens to see if we can match that neckline with Stanton but it doesn't matter because several converging instances of evidence already proved Stanton was Prayer Man...
The above should be enough for any credible researcher to realize Prayer Man has been proven to be Stanton so anyone who is ignoring it in contempt in order to offer already-refuted regressive arguments should be moderated...